Literature DB >> 21051670

Study design of the CLOSURE I Trial: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the STARFlex septal closure system versus best medical therapy in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack due to presumed paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale.

Anthony J Furlan1, Mark Reisman, Joseph Massaro, Laura Mauri, Harold Adams, Gregory W Albers, Robert Felberg, Howard Herrmann, Saibal Kar, Michael Landzberg, Albert Raizner, Lawrence Wechsler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Some strokes of unknown etiology may be the result of a paradoxical embolism traversing through a nonfused foramen ovale (patent foramen ovale [PFO]). The utility of percutaneously placed devices for treatment of patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and PFO is unknown. In addition, there are no clear data about the utility of medical interventions or other surgical procedures in this situation. Despite limited data, many patients are being treated with PFO closure devices. Thus, there is a strong need for clinical trials that test the potential efficacy of PFO occlusive devices in this situation. To address this gap in medical knowledge, we designed the CLOSURE I trial, a randomized, clinical trial comparing the use of a percutaneously placed PFO occlusive device and best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for prevention of recurrent ischemic neurologic symptoms among persons with TIA or ischemic stroke. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial has finished enrollment. Two-year follow-up for all 910 patients is required. The primary end point is the 2-year incidence of stroke or TIA, all-cause mortality for the first 30 days, and neurologic mortality from ≥ 31 days of follow-up, as adjudicated by a panel of physicians who are unaware of treatment allocation. This article describes the rationale and study design of CLOSURE I.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial should provide information as to whether the STARFlex septal closure system is safe and more effective than best medical therapy alone in preventing recurrent stroke/TIA and mortality in patients with PFO and whether the STARFlex septal closure device can demonstrate superiority compared with best medical therapy alone. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00201461.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051670     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  18 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of cardioembolic stroke.

Authors:  William David Freeman; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Late-breaking clinical trials presented at the American Heart Association Congress in Chicago 2010.

Authors:  Christoph Gensch; Uta Hoppe; Michael Böhm; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Maarten G Lansberg; Martin J O'Donnell; Pooja Khatri; Eddy S Lang; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Neil E Schwartz; Frank A Sonnenberg; Sam Schulman; Per Olav Vandvik; Frederick A Spencer; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gordon H Guyatt; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Transcatheter approaches to non-valvar structural heart disease.

Authors:  Damien Kenny; Ziyad M Hijazi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Patent foramen ovale: anatomy, outcomes, and closure.

Authors:  Patrick A Calvert; Bushra S Rana; Anna C Kydd; Leonard M Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Prediction of cardioembolic, arterial, and lacunar causes of cryptogenic stroke by gene expression and infarct location.

Authors:  Glen C Jickling; Boryana Stamova; Bradley P Ander; Xinhua Zhan; Dazhi Liu; Shara-Mae Sison; Piero Verro; Frank R Sharp
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: "Closed" door after the last randomized trials?

Authors:  Joel Hernandez; Raul Moreno
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-26

Review 8.  Patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Babikir Kheiri; Ahmed Abdalla; Mohammed Osman; Sahar Ahmed; Mustafa Hassan; Ghassan Bachuwa
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 9.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  The brain's heart - therapeutic opportunities for patent foramen ovale (PFO) and neurovascular disease.

Authors:  Mingming Ning; Eng H Lo; Pei-Chen Ning; Su-Yu Xu; David McMullin; Zareh Demirjian; Ignacio Inglessis; G William Dec; Igor Palacios; Ferdinando S Buonanno
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 12.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.