Literature DB >> 21051656

Breast cancer incidence in the randomized PEARL trial of lasofoxifene in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Andrea Z LaCroix1, Trevor Powles, C Kent Osborne, Kevin Wolter, John R Thompson, David D Thompson, D Craig Allred, Róisín Armstrong, Steve R Cummings, Richard Eastell, Kristine E Ensrud, Paul Goss, Andrew Lee, Patrick Neven, David M Reid, Madelyn Curto, Slobodan Vukicevic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently available selective estrogen receptor modulators reduce the risk of breast cancer, but they are not widely used. In the Postmenopausal Evaluation and Risk-Reduction with Lasofoxifene (PEARL) trial, lasofoxifene was shown to reduce the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, nonvertebral and vertebral fractures, coronary artery disease, and stroke, but the effects on total breast cancer (invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ, ER+ and estrogen receptor-negative [ER-]) and ER+ invasive breast cancer are unknown.
METHODS: Postmenopausal women (n = 8556) aged 59-80 years with low bone density and normal mammograms were randomly assigned to two doses of lasofoxifene (0.25 and 0.5 mg) or placebo. The primary endpoints of the PEARL trial were incidence of ER+ breast cancer and nonvertebral fractures at 5 years. A nested case-control study of 49 incident breast cancer case patients and 156 unaffected control subjects from the PEARL trial was performed to evaluate treatment effects on risk of total and ER+ invasive breast cancer by baseline serum estradiol and sex hormone-binding globulin levels using logistic regression models. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate risk of total breast cancer and ER+ invasive breast cancer using intention-to-treat analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Breast cancer was confirmed in 49 women. Compared with placebo, 0.5 mg of lasofoxifene statistically significantly reduced the risk of total breast cancer by 79% (hazard ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08 to 0.55) and ER+ invasive breast cancer by 83% (hazard ratio = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.57). The effects of 0.5 mg of lasofoxifene on total breast cancer were similar regardless of Gail score, whereas the effects were markedly stronger for women with baseline estradiol levels greater than the median (odds ratio = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.51) vs those with levels less than the median (odds ratio = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.16 to 3.79; P(interaction) = .04).
CONCLUSION: A 0.5-mg dose of lasofoxifene appears to reduce the risks of both total and ER+ invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051656     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  38 in total

1.  Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) lasofoxifene forms reactive quinones similar to estradiol.

Authors:  Bradley T Michalsen; Teshome B Gherezghiher; Jaewoo Choi; R Esala P Chandrasena; Zhihui Qin; Gregory R J Thatcher; Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 2.  Suitable trial designs and cohorts for preventive breast cancer agents.

Authors:  Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Perspective: The big C - for Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Michael B Sporn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Progress in endocrine approaches to the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ifeyinwa Obiorah; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Prevention: targeted therapy-anastrozole prevents breast cancer.

Authors:  Powel Brown
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Bazedoxifene exhibits antiestrogenic activity in animal models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: implications for treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Erik R Nelson; Christina A Chao; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Future directions in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Asad Umar; Barbara K Dunn; Peter Greenwald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Medical prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Max Dieterich; Bernd Gerber
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  From empirical to mechanism-based discovery of clinically useful Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs).

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Erik R Nelson; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.