Literature DB >> 21051444

Seasonal variation of serum vitamin D and the effect of vitamin D supplementation in Irish community-dwelling older people.

Roman Romero-Ortuno1, Lisa Cogan, Joseph Browne, Martin Healy, Miriam Catherine Casey, Conal Cunningham, James Bernard Walsh, Rose Anne Kenny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ireland is at 53°N, and its population risk of vitamin D deficiency is high. Previous Irish studies suggested a significant seasonality of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and a beneficial effect of supplementation in raising 25(OH)D levels. However, in Irish older people, little is known about the magnitude of the supplementation effect and whether supplementation affects 25(OH)D seasonality.
DESIGN: cross-sectional observational.
SETTING: outpatient clinic.
SUBJECTS: five hundred and forty-six community-dwelling subjects (mean age 73.0, SD 7.4; 68.5% females) were assessed between September 2007 and May 2009.
METHODS: for supplemented and non-supplemented: 'cosinor' analysis (Pulse_XP®) of monthly 25(OH)D. Period global solar radiation (GSR) and solar elevation angle (SEA) data were collected as proxy markers of ultraviolet-B radiation exposure. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to investigate the independent effect of GSR and SEA on 25(OH)D, controlling for confounders.
RESULTS: supplemented group (N = 183): 89.1% were on cholecalciferol 800 IU/day. Mean 25(OH)D = 64.1 (95% confidence interval: 52.2-75.8) nmol/l, with no significant seasonality; regression: neither GSR nor SEA predicted 25(OH)D. Non-supplemented group (N = 363): mean 25(OH)D = 40.3 (35.5-45.0) nmol/l, with significant seasonality (55.5% variance remaining), peak in August, amplitude = 6.0 (3.1-8.8) nmol/l; regression: both GSR (P = 0.002) and the interaction GSR * SEA (P = 0.018) predicted 25(OH)D.
CONCLUSIONS: vitamin D supplementation was associated with a mean serum 25(OH)D increase of 23.8 nmol/l. Interestingly, supplementation seemed to blunt seasonality. In the supplemented group, 72.1% had individual 25(OH)D levels below the recommended 75 nmol/l. There is a case for universal supplementation in Irish older people, probably at a higher dose. Further research is needed to establish the optimum dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051444     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  6 in total

Review 1.  Variability in free 25(OH) vitamin D levels in clinical populations.

Authors:  J B Schwartz; J Lai; B Lizaola; L Kane; P Weyland; N A Terrault; N Stotland; D Bikle
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.292

2.  Spectacular improvement in vitamin D status in elderly osteoporotic women: 8-year analysis of an osteoporotic population treated in a dedicated fracture liaison service.

Authors:  A Amouzougan; A Deygat; B Trombert; E Constant; D Denarié; H Marotte; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The influence of renal function on vitamin D metabolism in the very elderly.

Authors:  G Van Pottelbergh; C Matheï; B Vaes; W Adriaensen; D Gruson; J M Degryse
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Factors influencing the seasonal patterns of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Auda Fares
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-02

5.  Vitamin D Status and Mortality from SARS CoV-2: A Prospective Study of Unvaccinated Caucasian Adults.

Authors:  Robert Barrett; Modar Youssef; Irfan Shah; Julia Ioana; Abdullah Al Lawati; Abdullah Bukhari; Suzanne Hegarty; Liam J Cormican; Eoin Judge; Conor M Burke; Catriona Cody; Joseph Feely; Katrina Hutchinson; William Tormey; Eoghan O' Neill; Aoife O' Shea; Meabh Connolly; Daniel M A McCartney; John L Faul
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Make vitamin D while the sun shines, take supplements when it doesn't: a longitudinal, observational study of older adults in Tasmania, Australia.

Authors:  Jane K Pittaway; Kiran D K Ahuja; Jeffrey M Beckett; Marie-Louise Bird; Iain K Robertson; Madeleine J Ball
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.