Ana Maria Cartaxo1, Francisco S Vargas1, João Marcos Salge1, Bianca F Marcondes1, Eduardo H Genofre1, Leila Antonangelo1, Evaldo Marchi2, Lisete R Teixeira3. 1. Pleura Laboratory, Pulmonary Division-Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Pleura Laboratory, Pulmonary Division-Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Jundiaí, Brazil. 3. Pleura Laboratory, Pulmonary Division-Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: lisetepneumo@yahoo.com.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impairment in pulmonary capacity due to pleural effusion compromises daily activity. Removal of fluid improves symptoms, but the impact, especially on exercise capacity, has not been determined. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with unilateral pleural effusion documented by chest radiograph were included. The 6-min walk test, Borg modified dyspnea score, FVC, and FEV(1) were analyzed before and 48 h after the removal of large pleural effusions. RESULTS: The mean fluid removed was 1,564 ± 695 mL. After the procedure, values of FVC, FEV(1), and 6-min walk distance increased (P < .001), whereas dyspnea decreased (P < .001). Statistical correlations (P < .001) between 6-min walk distance and FVC (r = 0.725) and between 6-min walk distance and FEV(1) (r = 0.661) were observed. Correlations also were observed between the deltas (prethoracentesis × postthoracentesis) of the 6-min walk test and the percentage of FVC (r = 0.450) and of FEV(1) (r = 0.472) divided by the volume of fluid removed (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In addition to the improvement in lung function after thoracentesis, the benefits of fluid removal are more evident in situations of exertion, allowing better readaptation of patients to routine activities.
BACKGROUND: Impairment in pulmonary capacity due to pleural effusion compromises daily activity. Removal of fluid improves symptoms, but the impact, especially on exercise capacity, has not been determined. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with unilateral pleural effusion documented by chest radiograph were included. The 6-min walk test, Borg modified dyspnea score, FVC, and FEV(1) were analyzed before and 48 h after the removal of large pleural effusions. RESULTS: The mean fluid removed was 1,564 ± 695 mL. After the procedure, values of FVC, FEV(1), and 6-min walk distance increased (P < .001), whereas dyspnea decreased (P < .001). Statistical correlations (P < .001) between 6-min walk distance and FVC (r = 0.725) and between 6-min walk distance and FEV(1) (r = 0.661) were observed. Correlations also were observed between the deltas (prethoracentesis × postthoracentesis) of the 6-min walk test and the percentage of FVC (r = 0.450) and of FEV(1) (r = 0.472) divided by the volume of fluid removed (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In addition to the improvement in lung function after thoracentesis, the benefits of fluid removal are more evident in situations of exertion, allowing better readaptation of patients to routine activities.
Authors: Matthias Daniel Zink; Sören Weyer; Karolin Pauly; Andreas Napp; Michael Dreher; Steffen Leonhardt; Nikolaus Marx; Patrick Schauerte; Karl Mischke Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Rajesh Thomas; Maree Azzopardi; Sanjeevan Muruganandan; Catherine Read; Kevin Murray; Peter Eastwood; Sue Jenkins; Bhajan Singh; Y C Gary Lee Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Monika Zielinska-Krawczyk; Elzbieta M Grabczak; Marcin Michnikowski; Krzysztof Zielinski; Piotr Korczynski; Anna Stecka; Tomasz Golczewski; Rafal Krenke Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Sourin Bhuniya; Datta C Arunabha; Sabyasachi Choudhury; Indranil Saha; T Sumit Roy; Mita Saha Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: A Christine Argento; Terrence E Murphy; Margaret A Pisani; Katy L B Araujo; Jonathan Puchalski Journal: Pleura (Thousand Oaks) Date: 2015-09-01