Literature DB >> 21051127

Breech presentation and choice of mode of childbirth: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

Marie-Julia Guittier1, Jocelyne Bonnet, Graziella Jarabo, Michel Boulvain, Olivier Irion, Patricia Hudelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's perceptions of their experience of the diagnosis of breech presentation and decision-making processes regarding the choice of mode of childbirth.
DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed thematically.
SETTING: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: seven primiparous and five multiparous women experiencing a singleton breech presentation for childbirth were interviewed.
FINDINGS: Two concomitant and interdependent processes were identified. First, an emotional response ranging from the hope that the fetus would return to a normal vertex position to the acceptance of breech presentation and its consequences. Second, a decision-making process related to childbirth mode for breech presentation with the complex management of intra- and extra-personal factor influences. Women perceive information about the risks of vaginal childbirth of paramount importance compared with those associated with caesarean childbirth. When women choose vaginal childbirth, influences related to their personality and life history appear to predominate. Women often have the feeling of being alone to assume the choice of childbirth mode and possible complications. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of breech presentation should not be treated as a commonplace event. The role of caregivers needs to go beyond information on the risks and benefits of both modes of childbirth. Emphasis should be placed on listening to the expectations of pregnant women for childbirth, creating spaces for dialogue, and allowing additional time for reflection. Useful information material should be provided to give the women a feeling of shared decision-making.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051127     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  4 in total

1.  Women's experiences of planning a vaginal breech birth in Australia.

Authors:  Caroline Se Homer; Nicole P Watts; Karolina Petrovska; Chauncey M Sjostedt; Andrew Bisits
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Attitude of primiparous women towards their preference for delivery method: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Khatony; Ali Soroush; Bahare Andayeshgar; Neda Saedpanah; Alireza Abdi
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2019-08-20

3.  A qualitative interview study exploring pregnant women's and health professionals' attitudes to external cephalic version.

Authors:  Rebecca Say; Richard Thomson; Stephen Robson; Catherine Exley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version.

Authors:  N P Watts; K Petrovska; A Bisits; C Catling; C S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.