Literature DB >> 21051007

Implications of the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging and Classification on dermatologists and their patients.

Mary Alice Nading1, Charles M Balch, Arthur J Sober.   

Abstract

The Melanoma Staging and Classification system was recently revised by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and implemented effective January 2010 with changes reflecting new prognostic data gleaned by the significantly larger patient population studied for the 7th edition. This newest analysis yields important long-term outcome data as many of the patients were followed for nearly 2 decades. Additions to edition 7 of the AJCC Melanoma Staging classification highlight several important prognostic factors, particularly the addition of mitotic rate for classifying thin melanomas, the presence of microtumor burden in lymph nodes for stage III disease, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients with distant metastatic disease. Although the basic tumor-nodes-metastases (ie, TNM) cancer classification model remains unchanged in this newest edition, the current AJCC Melanoma Staging System has incorporated the latest prognostic data to accurately stratify patients into staging categories. It is important for clinicians and dermatopathologists to familiarize themselves with these changes so that patients are suitably managed and referred to medical and surgical oncologists when appropriate.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21051007     DOI: 10.1016/j.sder.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cutan Med Surg        ISSN: 1085-5629


  6 in total

1.  PET/CT in malignant melanoma: contrast-enhanced CT versus plain low-dose CT.

Authors:  Thomas Pfluger; Henriette Ingrid Melzer; Vera Schneider; Christian La Fougere; Eva Coppenrath; Carola Berking; Peter Bartenstein; Mayo Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Surgery vs non-surgery in cutaneous melanoma based on SEER database: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yingnan Liu; Dazhi Yang; Xiaokuan Fu; Yulong Sun; Hongtao Xiong; Xichi Fang; Yongqing Zhuang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  A protein deep sequencing evaluation of metastatic melanoma tissues.

Authors:  Charlotte Welinder; Krzysztof Pawłowski; Yutaka Sugihara; Maria Yakovleva; Göran Jönsson; Christian Ingvar; Lotta Lundgren; Bo Baldetorp; Håkan Olsson; Melinda Rezeli; Bo Jansson; Thomas Laurell; Thomas Fehniger; Balazs Döme; Johan Malm; Elisabet Wieslander; Toshihide Nishimura; György Marko-Varga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Economic evaluation of adverse events of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus nivolumab in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant cutaneous melanoma for adjuvant therapy in Germany.

Authors:  S Wahler; A Müller; C Koll; P Seyed-Abbaszadeh; J M Von Der Schulenburg
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  Impact of the 2009 (7th edition) AJCC melanoma staging system in the classification of thin cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Vicki H Chu; Michael T Tetzlaff; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Victor G Prieto; Roland Bassett; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Michael S McLemore; Doina Ivan; Wei-Lien Billy Wang; Merrick I Ross; Jonathan L Curry
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Adjuvant treatment of high-risk melanoma - cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options for BRAF 600 mutated tumors.

Authors:  Steffen Wahler; Alfred Müller; Sabine Fuchs; Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2022-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.