Literature DB >> 21050975

Acute lead dislodgements and in-hospital mortality in patients enrolled in the national cardiovascular data registry implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry.

Alan Cheng1, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P Curtis, Paul D Varosy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the incidence of acute lead dislodgements and the consequences of these events in patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry.
BACKGROUND: Lead dislodgements are common adverse events in patients undergoing ICD implants. Little is known regarding who is at risk and the consequences of these events.
METHODS: Patients enrolled between April 2006 and September 2008 were included. Acute lead dislodgement was defined as movement of the lead requiring another procedure for repositioning before discharge.
RESULTS: Acute dislodgement occurred in 2,628 of 226,764 patients. Univariate variables associated with dislodgements included older age, female sex, and patients with atrial fibrillation, chronic lung disease, cerebrovascular disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and lower ejection fractions (all p < 0.002). After multivariate adjustment, factors associated with an increased risk for dislodgement included New York Heart Association functional class IV heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, having a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator device, and procedures performed by physicians trained under alternative pathways. A teaching/training hospital setting was not a factor (p = 0.64). Acute dislodgements had increased odds for other adverse events including cardiac arrest, cardiac tamponade, device infection, pneumothorax, and in-hospital death even after adjustment for potential confounders (all p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute lead dislodgements occur more often in patients with more comorbidities and in patients undergoing implants by nonelectrophysiology-trained implanters. These events were strongly associated with increased odds for in-hospital death.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050975     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

1.  A "De-Synching" Feeling.

Authors:  David A Burkland; Mohammed Saeed; Yochai Birnbaum
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  [Predictors for need of antibradycardia and antitachycardia pacing after ICD implantation : Implications for the subcutaneous ICD].

Authors:  Martin Grett; Martin Christ; Hans-Joachim Trappe
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

3.  Quality improvement in heart rhythm care: the path forward.

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Adverse events following implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Persson; Amy Earley; Ann C Garlitski; Ethan M Balk; Katrin Uhlig
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Non-infective left ventricular lead complications requiring re-intervention following cardiac resynchronization therapy: prevalence, causes and outcomes.

Authors:  Christoffer Tobias Witt; Marie Jennyfer Ng Kam Chuen; Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Kristensen; Christian Gerdes; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Quadripolar Versus Non-Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Programmed to Biventricular Pacing With Single-Site Left Ventricular Pacing: Impact on Survival and Heart Failure Hospitalization.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Abbasin Zegard; Tian Qiu; Edmund Acquaye; Gaetano Ferrante; Jamie Walton; Howard Marshall
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Time course of current of injury is related to acute stability of active-fixation pacing leads in rabbits.

Authors:  Shalaimaiti Shali; Alimujiang Wushou; Entao Liu; Lin Jia; Ruiming Yao; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation.

Authors:  A Ghani; P P H M Delnoy; A R Ramdat Misier; J J J Smit; A Adiyaman; J P Ottervanger; A Elvan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  An openEHR based approach to improve the semantic interoperability of clinical data registry.

Authors:  Lingtong Min; Qi Tian; Xudong Lu; Jiye An; Huilong Duan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy system provides equivalent CRT responses with less complications than a conventional three-lead system: Results from the QP ExCELs lead registry.

Authors:  Naushad A Shaik; Michael Drucker; Christopher Pierce; Gabor Z Duray; Shane Gillett; Crystal Miller; Camden Harrell; George Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.