Curtis Myden1, Kevin Hildebrand. 1. Division of Orthopedics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. camyden@ucalgary.ca
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to follow elbow range of motion for 1 year after injury and to document the rate of secondary intervention due to joint contracture. METHODS: We prospectively followed up 25 subjects with traumatic elbow injuries. Data were collected up to 52 weeks after injury. Injuries at the elbow included fractures, elbow dislocations, fracture-dislocations, and biceps tendon ruptures. Subjects were treated as their injury necessitated, with a rehabilitation protocol for each injury type. RESULTS: There was significant improvement for all range-of-motion measures for the time course to 1-year follow up (P < .05). At 1 year, 22 of 25 subjects achieved a flexion-extension arc greater than 100°. At 1 year, 24 of 25 subjects achieved a pronation-supination arc greater than 100°. Reoperation was performed in 5 of 25 subjects; in 3 of which, this was because of elbow joint contracture. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic elbow injuries carry a risk of joint contracture, 12% of our subjects did not regain a functional range of motion, and 12% had a joint contracture that required reoperation. Range of motion continues to improve up to 1 year after injury; failure to progress 3 months after injury suggests impending elbow joint contractures.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to follow elbow range of motion for 1 year after injury and to document the rate of secondary intervention due to joint contracture. METHODS: We prospectively followed up 25 subjects with traumatic elbow injuries. Data were collected up to 52 weeks after injury. Injuries at the elbow included fractures, elbow dislocations, fracture-dislocations, and biceps tendon ruptures. Subjects were treated as their injury necessitated, with a rehabilitation protocol for each injury type. RESULTS: There was significant improvement for all range-of-motion measures for the time course to 1-year follow up (P < .05). At 1 year, 22 of 25 subjects achieved a flexion-extension arc greater than 100°. At 1 year, 24 of 25 subjects achieved a pronation-supination arc greater than 100°. Reoperation was performed in 5 of 25 subjects; in 3 of which, this was because of elbow joint contracture. CONCLUSIONS:Traumatic elbow injuries carry a risk of joint contracture, 12% of our subjects did not regain a functional range of motion, and 12% had a joint contracture that required reoperation. Range of motion continues to improve up to 1 year after injury; failure to progress 3 months after injury suggests impending elbow joint contractures.
Authors: Chelsey L Dunham; Ryan M Castile; Necat Havlioglu; Aaron M Chamberlain; Leesa M Galatz; Spencer P Lake Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Alex Reiter; Griffin Kivitz; Ryan M Castile; Paul Cannon; Emily Lakes; Brittanny Jacobs; Kyle Allen; Aaron M Chamberlain; Spencer P Lake Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Chelsey L Dunham; Ryan M Castile; Aaron M Chamberlain; Leesa M Galatz; Spencer P Lake Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Alex J Reiter; Ryan M Castile; Hayden R Schott; Griffin J Kivitz; Aaron M Chamberlain; Spencer P Lake Journal: Muscles Ligaments Tendons J Date: 2021 Jul-Sep