Literature DB >> 21050620

An Evaluation of Three Intensive Supervision Programs for Serious DWI Offenders.

Connie H Wiliszowski1, James C Fell, A Scott McKnight, A Scott Tippetts, J Decarlo Ciccel.   

Abstract

There are many variations of supervision and probation programs for driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) offenders. These programs include case-specific restrictions (e.g., individualized conditions to probation), unsupervised probation, basic supervision probation (e.g., regularly scheduled visits to probation services with varying frequency), and intensive supervision probation (which may involve many program components and close monitoring). Offenders who receive monitoring through intensive supervision programs (ISPs) have more contact with probation officers, a judge, or other designated authorities compared to standard (nonintensive) probation programs. Three ISPs were evaluated: the Minnesota Staggered Sentencing Program, the Westchester County New York DWI Enforcement Program, and the Oregon Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants (DUII) Intensive Supervision Program (DISP). The Minnesota program appeared to be successful in reducing offender recidivism in a relatively small ISP (n=200 offenders in the program). Compared to a similar matched group of DWI offenders, the staggered sentencing offenders had a significant 30.6% lower recidivism rate (p=.017) up to 4 years postoffense. The program prevented an estimated 15 to 23 re-arrests for DWI. Compared to a matched group of offenders, the Westchester County program appeared to be effective in the short term (18.1% lower recidivism in 5 years postoffense [p<.001]) but not in the long term (only 5.4% [p=.171] lower recidivism in 15 years postoffense). This program resulted in an estimated 78 fewer re-arrests for DWI in the first 5 years. The Oregon DISP intervention group had 54.1% lower recidivism up to 8 years postindex offense than both of the stratified matched-sample comparison groups, adjusting for the demographic covariates (Wald=51.50; p>.001). The program prevented 67 re-arrests for DWI in the first 8 years. The benefit/cost of ISPs appears to be very good for the prevention of re-arrests.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050620      PMCID: PMC3242566     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1943-2461


  12 in total

1.  The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes.

Authors:  R B Voas; A S Tippetts; J Fell
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2000-07

Review 2.  Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Traci L Toomey
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Sobriety checkpoints: evidence of effectiveness is strong, but use is limited.

Authors:  James C Fell; John H Lacey; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.491

4.  Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): the first 25 years.

Authors:  James C Fell; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.491

5.  The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States.

Authors:  James C Fell; Deborah A Fisher; Robert B Voas; Kenneth Blackman; A Scott Tippetts
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-04-09

6.  Effects of Massachusetts raising its legal drinking age from 18 to 20 on deaths from teenage homicide, suicide, and nontraffic accidents.

Authors:  R Hingson; D Merrigan; T Heeren
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.278

7.  Lower legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers.

Authors:  R Hingson; T Heeren; M Winter
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders.

Authors:  E Wells-Parker; R Bangert-Drowns; R McMillen; M Williams
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 9.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.

Authors:  R A Shults; R W Elder; D A Sleet; J L Nichols; M O Alao; V G Carande-Kulis; S Zaza; D M Sosin; R S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  The effect of random alcohol screening in reducing motor vehicle crash injuries.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.