Literature DB >> 21050389

Are the benefits of the 'Healthy Start' food support scheme sustained at three months postpartum? Results from the Sheffield 'before and after' study.

Theodora Mouratidou1, Fiona A Ford, Sarah E Wademan, Robert B Fraser.   

Abstract

Early results examining nutritional behaviour of Caucasian, English-speaking, postpartum women living in Sheffield, who were beneficiaries or eligible for the Welfare Food Scheme (WFS) or the Healthy Start (HS) scheme, suggested significant between-groups differences. The aim of this study was to examine whether differences observed at 4 weeks postpartum were sustained over time. Eighty-six WFS and 64 HS participants were recruited at baseline and, thereafter, 53 WFS and 33 HS participants at week 8, and 47 WFS and 39 HS participants at week 12. Dietary intakes were assessed by an interviewer-administered, semi-quantified food frequency questionnaire. At 4 weeks, HS women had higher energy intakes compared to WFS women, (9.7 MJ and 8.1 MJ, respectively). Differences were also sustained at 8 weeks, (8.8 MJ and 7.2 MJ) and 12 weeks (9.4 MJ and 7.6 MJ) for the HS and WFS participants, respectively. Within-groups, energy and most of nutrient intakes did not change appreciably over time. Consumption of fruit and vegetables at baseline, were significantly higher (P = 0.023) for participants under the HS scheme (3.4 portions) compared to WFS participants (2.7 portions). Differences were sustained over time as HS women reported consuming 4.1 and 3.7 portions/day respectively at 8 and 12 weeks, as opposed to 2.8 and 2.7 portions/day reported by WFS women. The study findings provided evidence of the potential effectiveness of the HS scheme in a population subgroup at risk of dietary deficiencies. Early findings could provide a useful snapshot of the diet of such mobile population and should be further exploited.
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050389      PMCID: PMC6860794          DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00215.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  12 in total

1.  Does participation in a population-based dietary intervention scheme have a lasting impact on fruit intake in young children?

Authors:  A W Fogarty; M Antoniak; A J Venn; L Davies; A Goodwin; N Salfield; J Stocks; J Britton; S A Lewis
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Diet during pregnancy in a population of pregnant women in South West England. ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood.

Authors:  I Rogers; P Emmett
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Assessing change in diet-intervention research.

Authors:  A R Kristal; S A Beresford; D Lazovich
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire in assessing dietary intakes of low-income Caucasian postpartum women living in Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Theodora Mouratidou; Fiona A Ford; Robert B Fraser
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Dietary intake in the diabetes prevention program cohort: baseline and 1-year post randomization.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Karen C Sparks; Katherine Hirst; Tina Costacou; Jennifer C Lovejoy; Judith G Regensteiner; Mary A Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; George A Bray
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  A population-based dietary intervention trial in a high-risk area for stomach cancer and stroke: changes in intakes and related biomarkers.

Authors:  Yoshiko Takashashi; Satoshi Sasaki; Masako Takahashi; Shunji Okubo; Masato Hayashi; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls.

Authors:  Cynthia A Thomson; Anna Giuliano; Cheryl L Rock; Cheryl K Ritenbaugh; Shirley W Flatt; Susan Faerber; Vicky Newman; Bette Caan; Ellen Graver; Vern Hartz; Robin Whitacre; Felicia Parker; John P Pierce; James R Marshall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Effect of the introduction of 'Healthy Start' on dietary behaviour during and after pregnancy: early results from the 'before and after' Sheffield study.

Authors:  Fiona A Ford; Theodora Mouratidou; Sarah E Wademan; Robert B Fraser
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J K Ransley; D C Greenwood; J E Cade; S Blenkinsop; I Schagen; D Teeman; E Scott; G White; S Schagen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  Nutrition interventions in women in low-income groups in the UK.

Authors:  Annie S Anderson
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  An exploration of the statutory Healthy Start vitamin supplementation scheme in North West England.

Authors:  May Moonan; Gillian Maudsley; Barbara Hanratty; Margaret Whitehead
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew P Black; Julie Brimblecombe; Helen Eyles; Peter Morris; Hassan Vally; Kerin O Dea
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Can food vouchers improve nutrition and reduce health inequalities in low-income mothers and young children: a multi-method evaluation of the experiences of beneficiaries and practitioners of the Healthy Start programme in England.

Authors:  Alison McFadden; Josephine M Green; Victoria Williams; Jenny McLeish; Felicia McCormick; Julia Fox-Rushby; Mary J Renfrew
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.