Literature DB >> 21050145

An overview of methods for the in vivo evaluation of tissue-engineered skin constructs.

Gerwen Lammers1, Pauline D H M Verhaegen, Magda M W Ulrich, Joost Schalkwijk, Esther Middelkoop, Daniela Weiland, Suzan T M Nillesen, Toin H Van Kuppevelt, Willeke F Daamen.   

Abstract

Cutaneous wounding often leads to contraction and scarring, which may result in a range of functional, cosmetic, and psychological complications. Tissue-engineered skin substitutes are being developed to enhance restoration of the skin and improve the quality of wound healing. The aim of this review is to provide researchers in the field of tissue engineering an overview of the methods that are currently used to clinically evaluate skin wound healing, and methods that are used to evaluate tissue-engineered constructs in animal models. Clinically, the quality of wound healing is assessed by noninvasive subjective scar assessment scales and objective techniques to measure individual scar features. Alternatively, invasive technologies are used. In animal models, most tissue-engineered skin constructs studied are at least evaluated macroscopically and by using conventional histology (hematoxylin-eosin staining). Planimetry and immunohistochemistry are also often applied. An overview of antibodies used is provided. In addition, some studies used methods to assess gene expression levels and mRNA location, transillumination for blood vessel observation, in situ/in vivo imaging, electron microscopy, mechanical strength assessment, and microbiological sampling. A more systematic evaluation of tissue-engineered skin constructs in animal models is recommended to enhance the comparison of different constructs, thereby accelerating the trajectory to application in human patients. This would be further enhanced by the embracement of more clinically relevant objective evaluation methods. In addition, fundamental knowledge on construct-mediated wound healing may be increased by new developments in, for example, gene expression analysis and noninvasive imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050145     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2010.0473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  11 in total

1.  Integrated multimodal optical microscopy for structural and functional imaging of engineered and natural skin.

Authors:  Youbo Zhao; Benedikt W Graf; Eric J Chaney; Ziad Mahmassani; Eleni Antoniadou; Ross Devolder; Hyunjoon Kong; Marni D Boppart; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.207

2.  X-ray Phase Contrast Allows Three Dimensional, Quantitative Imaging of Hydrogel Implants.

Authors:  Alyssa A Appel; Jeffery C Larson; Bin Jiang; Zhong Zhong; Mark A Anastasio; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Imaging challenges in biomaterials and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Alyssa A Appel; Mark A Anastasio; Jeffery C Larson; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Evaluation of collagen type I scaffolds including gelatin-collagen microparticles and Aloe vera in a model of full-thickness skin wound.

Authors:  Liliana Gil-Cifuentes; Ronald A Jiménez; Marta R Fontanilla
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Human amniotic fluid derived cells can competently substitute dermal fibroblasts in a tissue-engineered dermo-epidermal skin analog.

Authors:  Fabienne Hartmann-Fritsch; Nynke Hosper; Joachim Luginbühl; Thomas Biedermann; Ernst Reichmann; Martin Meuli
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  Preparing the ground for tissue regeneration: from mechanism to therapy.

Authors:  Stuart J Forbes; Nadia Rosenthal
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Noninvasive Optical Assessment of Implanted Tissue-Engineered Construct Success In Situ.

Authors:  William R Lloyd; Seung Yup Lee; Sakib F Elahi; Leng-Chun Chen; Shiuhyang Kuo; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Cynthia Marcelo; Stephen E Feinberg; Mary-Ann Mycek
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.056

8.  Analysis of the occurrence and distribution of primary and recurrent basal cell carcinoma of head and neck coupled to the assessment of tumor microenvironment and Sonic hedgehog signaling.

Authors:  Jelena Moisejenko-Golubovica; Oleg Volkov; Anna Ivanova; Valerija Groma
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.033

9.  Evaluation of dermal substitute in a novel co-transplantation model with autologous epidermal sheet.

Authors:  Guofeng Huang; Shizhao Ji; Pengfei Luo; Yunqing Zhang; Guangyi Wang; Shihui Zhu; Shichu Xiao; Zhaofan Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Strategies Demonstrating Efficacy in Reducing Wound Contraction In Vivo.

Authors:  Justin R Sharpe; Yella Martin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.