Literature DB >> 21049882

Responses of stream macroinvertebrates to Bt maize leaf detritus.

Catherine P Chambers1, Matt R Whiles, Emma J Rosi-Marshall, Jennifer L Tank, Todd V Royer, Natalie A Griffiths, Michelle A Evans-White, Amber R Stojak.   

Abstract

In the midwestern United States, maize detritus enters streams draining agricultural land. Genetically modified Bt maize is commonly planted along streams and can possibly affect benthic macroinvertebrates, specifically members of the order Trichoptera, which are closely related to target species of some Bt toxins and are important detritivores in streams. The significance of inputs of Bt maize to aquatic systems has only recently been recognized, and assessments of potential nontarget impacts on aquatic organisms are lacking. We conducted laboratory feeding trials and found that the leaf-shredding trichopteran, Lepidostoma liba, grew significantly slower when fed Bt maize compared to non-Bt maize, while other invertebrate taxa that we examined showed no negative effects. We also used field studies to assess the influence of Bt maize detritus on benthic macroinvertebrate abundance, diversity, biomass, and functional structure in situ in 12 streams adjacent to Bt maize or non-Bt maize fields. We found no significant differences in total abundance or biomass between Bt and non-Bt streams, and trichopterans comprised only a small percentage of invertebrate biomass at all sites (0-15%). Shannon diversity did not differ among Bt and non-Bt streams and was always low (H' range = 0.9-1.9). Highly tolerant taxa, such as oligochaetes and chironomids, were dominant in both Bt and non-Bt streams, and macroinvertebrate community composition was relatively constant across seasons. We used litterbags to examine macroinvertebrate colonization of Bt and non-Bt maize detritus and found no significant differences among litter or stream types. Our in situ findings did not support our laboratory results; this is likely because the streams we studied in this region are highly degraded and subject to multiple, persistent anthropogenic stressors (e.g., channelization, altered flow, nutrient and pesticide inputs). Invertebrate communities in these streams are a product of these degraded conditions, and thus the impact of a single stressor, such as Bt toxins, may not be readily discernable. Our results add to growing evidence that Bt toxins can have sublethal effects on nontarget aquatic taxa, but this evidence should be considered in the context of other anthropogenic impacts and alternative methods of pest control influencing streams draining agricultural regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21049882     DOI: 10.1890/09-0598.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Occurrence of maize detritus and a transgenic insecticidal protein (Cry1Ab) within the stream network of an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Jennifer L Tank; Emma J Rosi-Marshall; Todd V Royer; Matt R Whiles; Natalie A Griffiths; Therese C Frauendorf; David J Treering
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens.

Authors:  Jonathan M Jeschke; Felicia Keesing; Richard S Ostfeld
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Quality of laboratory studies assessing effects of Bt-proteins on non-target organisms: minimal criteria for acceptability.

Authors:  Adinda De Schrijver; Yann Devos; Patrick De Clercq; Achim Gathmann; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Degradation of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis proteins in corn tissue in response to post-harvest management practices.

Authors:  V Yurchak; A W Leslie; G P Dively; W O Lamp; C R R Hooks
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Effects of Transgenic cry1Ca Rice on the Development of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Xiuping Chen; Jiamei Wang; Haojun Zhu; Yunhe Li; Jiatong Ding; Yufa Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transport and instream removal of the Cry1Ab protein from genetically engineered maize is mediated by biofilms in experimental streams.

Authors:  Arial J Shogren; Jennifer L Tank; Emma J Rosi; Martha M Dee; Shannon L Speir; Diogo Bolster; Scott P Egan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chronic Responses of Daphnia magna Under Dietary Exposure to Leaves of a Transgenic (Event MON810) Bt-Maize Hybrid and its Conventional Near-Isoline.

Authors:  Daniel Ferreira Holderbaum; Marek Cuhra; Fern Wickson; Afonso Inácio Orth; Rubens Onofre Nodari; Thomas Bøhn
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2015

9.  The role of C:N:P stoichiometry in affecting denitrification in sediments from agricultural surface and tile-water wetlands.

Authors:  Brian D Grebliunas; William L Perry
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-22

10.  Effect of Bt toxin Cry1Ab on two freshwater caddisfly shredders - an attempt to establish dose-effect relationships through food-spiking.

Authors:  Antonia Pott; Mirco Bundschuh; Rebecca Bundschuh; Mathias Otto; Ralf Schulz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.