Literature DB >> 21049239

Inter and intra-rater reliability of the scoliometer.

Guilherme H Bonagamba1, Daniel M Coelho, Anamaria S de Oliveira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: the scoliometer was developed to analyze the axial rotation of the trunk in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. However, there is controversy regarding the reliability of the measures obtained with this device.
OBJECTIVES: to test the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the scoliometer in patients with scoliosis.
METHODS: 24 volunteers of both sex with idiopathic scoliosis diagnostic (18 ± 4 years-old) and curvatures with mean and standard deviation of 24.8 ± 12.7º Cobb. The measurement procedure was accomplished in one day by two trained examiners. The palpation and determination of each spinal level was accomplished by just one examiner. Each examiner obtained one measure with the device for each vertebra from the thoracic and lumbar levels in each evaluation. For statistical analysis the measurements were divided by spinal levels into upper thorax, medium thorax, lower thorax and lumbar segments. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient type 1,1 (ICC1,1) was used to determine the intra-rater reliability while the ICC3,1 was used to determine the inter-rater reliability.
RESULTS: the observed intra-rater reliability values for the medium and lower thorax and lumbar segments of the subjects ranged from very good to excellent. The inter-rater reliability of the measures of axial trunk rotations was considered good to the upper thorax and excellent for the medium and lower thorax and lumbar spine.
CONCLUSIONS: the scoliometer is a device that has intra-rater reliability estimates ranging from very good to excellent. The inter-rater reliability for the upper and low thorax and for the lumbar spine is relatively lower than the intra-rater values for the same spinal segments, even when the errors from palpation and positioning of the instrument were eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21049239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Fisioter


  20 in total

1.  Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Chalmers; Lindsey Westover; Johith Jacob; Andreas Donauer; Vicky H Zhao; Eric C Parent; Marc J Moreau; James K Mahood; Douglas M Hedden; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh Prowse; Rodney Pope; Paul Gerdhem; Allan Abbott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  Scoliosis after thoracotomy/sternotomy in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Hojjat Hosseinpour Feiz; Abbas Afrasiabi; Rezayat Parvizi; Ahad Safarpour; Rohollah Fadaei Fouladi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Factors associated with scoliosis in schoolchildren: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Marina Pegoraro Baroni; Geronimo José Bouzas Sanchis; Sanderson José Costa de Assis; Rafael Gomes dos Santos; Silvana Alves Pereira; Klayton Galante Sousa; Johnnatas Mikael Lopes
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Evaluation of the iPhone with an acrylic sleeve versus the Scoliometer for rib hump measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Maree T Izatt; Gary R Bateman; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2012-07-30

7.  Body structures and physical complaints in upper limb reduction deficiency: a 24-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Sietke G Postema; Corry K van der Sluis; Kristina Waldenlöv; Liselotte M Norling Hermansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Zhen Liu; Bangping Qian; Yong Qiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Psychometric evaluation of spinal assessment methods to screen for scoliosis in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Måns Persson-Bunke; Tomasz Czuba; Gunnar Hägglund; Elisabet Rodby-Bousquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The correlation between calcaneal valgus angle and asymmetrical thoracic-lumbar rotation angles in patients with adolescent scoliosis.

Authors:  Jaeyong Park; Sang Gil Lee; Jongjin Bae; Jung Chul Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.