| Literature DB >> 21049210 |
Suzana Pinheiro Pimenta1, Renata Barbosa da Rocha, Bruno Guedes Baldi, Alexandre de Melo Kawassaki, Ronaldo Adib Kairalla, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The functional evaluation has become increasingly important in the understanding and management of patients with interstitial lung diseases. The cardiopulmonary exercise test and the six-minute walk test (6MWT), through their isolated variables, have been used to do this evaluation, with some limitations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21049210 PMCID: PMC2954734 DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322010000900005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Demographic and functional parameters in ILD patients and controls.
| ILD | ||||||
| CONTROLS (N = 11) | TOTAL (N = 49)♦ | IPF (N = 23) | LAM (N = 15) | CHP (N = 6) | CLF (5) | |
| Age years (SD) | 65 (9) | 60 (12)* | 68 (9) | 47 (7) | 63 (11) | 58 (11) |
| Sex (M / F) | 9 / 2 | 24 / 25 | 17/6 | 0/15 | 2/4 | 4/1 |
| Ex‐ smokers | 0 / 11 | 19 / 49 | 15/23 | 3/15 | 4/6 | 1/5 |
| FVC % (SD) | 103 (11) | 76 (16)† | 72 (24) | 89 (13) | 70 (22) | 74 (18) |
| FEV1 % (SD) | 106 (11) | 75 (18)† | 79 (26) | 71 (24) | 76 (21) | 81 (19) |
| TLC % (SD) | 98 (11) | 80 (19)† | 74 (26) | 98 (13) | 72 (17) | 73 (19) |
| DLco % (SD) | 103 (21) | 46 (16)† | 39 (16) | 55 (18) | 46 (12) | 56 (12) |
ILD – interstitial lung disease; IPF – interstitial pulmonary fibrosis; LAM – lymphangioleiomyomatosis; CHP – chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; CLF – centrilobular fibrosis; SD ‐ Standard deviation; FVC % ‐ predicted forced vital capacity; FEV1 % ‐ predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second; TLC % ‐ predicted total lung capacity; DLco % ‐ predicted diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide
t test between controls and all 49 ILD patients
p value not significant †p < 0,05
Six‐minute walk test parameters in ILD patients and controls.
| ILD | ||||||
| CONTROLS (N = 11) | TOTAL (N = 49) | IPF (N = 23) | LAM (N = 15) | CHP (N = 6) | CLF (5) | |
| Distance (SD) | 602 m (95) | 430 m (122)† | 373 m (114) | 480m (116) | 484 m (117) | 474 m (87) |
| SpO2 basal % (SD) | 96.5 (2) | 95 (2) | 94 (3) | 95 (3) | 95 (2) | 96 (1) |
| SpO2 min % (SD) | 94 (2) | 85 (8)† | 82 (7) | 87 (10) | 86 (5) | 86 (4) |
| SpO2 basal ‐ min (IQ) | 3 (2 – 4) | 10 (6 ‐ 13)† | 10 (9 ‐ 15) | 5 (2 ‐ 11) | 9 (6 ‐ 11) | 10 (6 ‐ 12) |
| DDR (IQ) | 2.5 (2 – 4.5) | 10 (6 ‐ 17)† | 11 (9 ‐ 23) | 6 (4 ‐ 12) | 8 (6 ‐ 10) | 8 (6 ‐ 8) |
SD ‐ Standard deviation; IQ – interquartile; Distance in meters; DDR ‐ desaturation distance ratio; SpO2 basal % ‐ peripheral oxygen saturation at rest; SpO2 min % ‐ minimal sustained SpO2 during ≥ 10 seconds
Comparison between controls and all 49 ILD patients
p value not significant †p < 0,05
Correlations between six‐minute walk test parameters and functional variables in ILD patients.
| DD Ratio† | Distance | SpO2 min % | SpO2 basal ‐ min† | |
| DLco % | r = ‐ 0.72 | r = 0.58 | r = 0.61 | r = ‐ 0.67 |
| p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | |
| FVC % | r = ‐ 0.46 | r = 0.33 | r = 0.43 | r = ‐ 0.50 |
| p = 0.001 | p = 0.02 | p = 0.002 | p < 0.001 | |
| FEV1 % | r = ‐ 0.52 | r = 0.25 | r = 0.59 | r = ‐ 0.60 |
| p < 0.001 | p = 0.08 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
Distance in meters; DD Ratio ‐ desaturation distance ratio; SpO2 min % ‐ minimal sustained peripheral oxygen saturation during ≥ 10 seconds; SpO2 basal % ‐ peripheral oxygen saturation at rest
Pearson †Spearman