Literature DB >> 21049126

Engineered 3D environments to elucidate the effect of environmental parameters on drug response in cancer.

Maria Håkanson1, Marcus Textor, Mirren Charnley.   

Abstract

Traditional in vitro models used for the development of anti-cancer drugs are based on the monolayer culture of cells, which has a limited predictivity of in vivo efficacy. A number of cell culture platforms have been developed in recent years to improve predictivity and further to elucidate the mechanisms governing the differing responses observed in vitro versus in vivo. One detrimental aspect of current in vitro models is their inability to decouple the effect of different extrinsic factors on the responsiveness of the cells to drug treatment. Here, we have used an engineered poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microwell array as a reductionist approach to study the effect of environmental parameters, independently of each other. It is observed for MCF-7 breast cancer cells, that culture within the three-dimensional (3D) environment of the microwells alone had an effect on the response to Taxol and results in a reduction of cell death in comparison to cells cultured on flat substrates. Additionally the microwells allowed the response of single versus multicell clusters to be differentiated. It was found that the formation of cell-cell contacts alters the drug response, depending on the type of adhesive protein present. Thus, with this microwell platform it is revealed that the presence of cell-cell contacts in addition to the dimensionality and the matrix composition of the environment are important mediators of altered drug responses. In conclusion the microwell array can not only serve as a platform to reveal which parameters of the extracellular environment affect drug response but further the interdependence of these parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21049126     DOI: 10.1039/c0ib00074d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  27 in total

1.  Perspective: Flicking with flow: Can microfluidics revolutionize the cancer research?

Authors:  Tamal Das; Suman Chakraborty
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  A computational approach to detect gap junction plaques and associate them with cells in fluorescent images.

Authors:  Joshua S Goldberg; Tegy J Vadakkan; Karen K Hirschi; Mary E Dickinson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  The potential of organoids in urological cancer research.

Authors:  Shangqian Wang; Dong Gao; Yu Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Biomaterial arrays with defined adhesion ligand densities and matrix stiffness identify distinct phenotypes for tumorigenic and nontumorigenic human mesenchymal cell types.

Authors:  Tyler D Hansen; Justin T Koepsel; Ngoc Nhi Le; Eric H Nguyen; Stefan Zorn; Matthew Parlato; Samuel G Loveland; Michael P Schwartz; William L Murphy
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.843

5.  Overexpression of monocarboxylate anion transporter 1 and 4 in T24-induced cancer-associated fibroblasts regulates the progression of bladder cancer cells in a 3D microfluidic device.

Authors:  Haoqing Shi; Haiping Jiang; Lina Wang; Yanwei Cao; Pengfei Liu; Xiaodong Xu; Youlin Wang; Lijiang Sun; Haitao Niu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Bioengineering approaches to study multidrug resistance in tumor cells.

Authors:  Brian Fallica; Guy Makin; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  Miniaturized pre-clinical cancer models as research and diagnostic tools.

Authors:  Maria Håkanson; Edna Cukierman; Mirren Charnley
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Non-Destructive Tumor Aggregate Morphology and Viability Quantification at Cellular Resolution, During Development and in Response to Drug.

Authors:  Cassandra L Roberge; David M Kingsley; Denzel E Faulkner; Charles J Sloat; Ling Wang; Margarida Barroso; Xavier Intes; David T Corr
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Rapid prototyping of concave microwells for the formation of 3D multicellular cancer aggregates for drug screening.

Authors:  Ting-Yuan Tu; Zhe Wang; Jing Bai; Wei Sun; Weng Kung Peng; Ruby Yun-Ju Huang; Jean-Paul Thiery; Roger D Kamm
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 10.  A new toolbox for assessing single cells.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsioris; Alexis J Torres; Thomas B Douce; J Christopher Love
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.