Literature DB >> 21049070

Zurich Consensus: German Expert Opinion on the St. Gallen Votes on 15 March 2009 (11th International Conference at St. Gallen: Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer).

Matthias W Beckmann1, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Serban-Dan Costa, Klaus Diedrich, Ingo Diel, Wolfgang Eiermann, Klaus Friese, Bernd Gerber, Nadia Harbeck, Joern Hilfrich, Wolfgang Janni, Fritz Jaenicke, Walter Jonat, Manfred Kaufmann, Marion Kiechle, Uwe Koehler, Rolf Kreienberg, Gunter von Minckwitz, Volker Moebus, Ulrike Nitz, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christoph Thomssen, Diethelm Wallwiener.   

Abstract

A German working group of 23 breast cancer experts discussed the results from the vote at this year's St. Gallen Consensus Conference on Primary Therapy for Early Breast Cancer (March 11-14, 2009) and came up with some concrete recommendations for day-to-day therapeutic decisions in Germany. Due the fact that the concept of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference merely allows for a minimal consensus, the objective of the working group was to provide practice-related recommendations for day-to-day clinical decisions in Germany. One area of emphasis at St. Gallen was tumor biology as a starting point for reaching individual therapeutic decisions. Intensive discussion was necessary with respect to the clinical relevance of predictive and prognostic factors. A new addition to the area of systemic therapy was a first-ever discussion of the adjuvant administration of bisphosponates and the fact that therapy with trastuzumab in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer has been defined as the standard for neoadjuvant therapy. The value of taxanes as a component of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy as well as the value of aromatase inhibitors for the endocrine adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients were affirmed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21049070      PMCID: PMC2931071          DOI: 10.1159/000212164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  4 in total

1.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; M P Lux; E Wenkel; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 2.  Health Services Research and Health Economy - Quality Care Training in Gynaecology, with Focus On Gynaecological Oncology.

Authors:  M P Lux; P A Fasching; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; M G Schrauder; M R Bani; F C Thiel; C C Hack; T Hildebrandt; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Use of Tomosynthesis in Intraoperative Digital Specimen Radiography - Is a Reduction of Breast Re-excision Rates Possible?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M R Bani; M P Lux; M Meier-Meitinger; E Wenkel; S Schwab; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Adamietz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.