Literature DB >> 21048742

Transparency showcases strength of peer review.

Bernd Pulverer1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 21048742     DOI： 10.1038/468029a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Peer review and fraud.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Opening up peer review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  The EMBO Journal 2009: new initiatives.

Authors:  Pernille Rørth
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Opening up BMJ peer review.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02
  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  A transparent black box.

Authors:  Bernd Pulverer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Peer reviews: some are already public.

Authors:  Bernd Pulverer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Transparency in peer review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Peer Review beyond Journals.

Authors:  Bernd Pulverer; Thomas Lemberger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The fifth decade.

Authors:  Bernd Pulverer; Facundo D Batista
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; Margaret A Taub; Fernando J Pineda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Opening Pandora's box: cause and impact of errors on plant pigment studies.

Authors:  Beatriz Fernández-Marín; Unai Artetxe; Oihana Barrutia; Raquel Esteban; Antonio Hernández; José I García-Plazaola
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities.

Authors:  Roger Chun-Man Ho; Kwok-Kei Mak; Ren Tao; Yanxia Lu; Jeffrey R Day; Fang Pan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Association claims in the sequencing era.

Authors:  Sara L Pulit; Maarten Leusink; Androniki Menelaou; Paul I W de Bakker
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.096
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.