CONTEXT: Tubal ectopic pregnancy is common, but accurate diagnosis is difficult and costly. There is currently no serum test to differentiate tubal from intrauterine implantation, and an effective biomarker of ectopic pregnancy would be a major clinical advance. OBJECTIVE: A key feature of successful intrauterine implantation is the establishment of a supportive vascular network, and this has been associated with the activity of placental growth factor (PIGF). We hypothesized that the local decidual environment facilitates PIGF-dependent angiogenesis and that this pathway is not active in tubal implantation. We aimed to determine whether tubal implantation is manifest by an attenuation of the normal trophoblast PIGF response and whether serum PIGF levels are different in ectopic compared with intrauterine pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Tissue and serum analysis was done at a large United Kingdom teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Tissue and sera were collected from gestation-matched pregnant women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy (viable intrauterine) (n = 15), evacuation of uterus for embryonic missed miscarriage (nonviable intrauterine) (n = 10) and surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy (n = 15). INTERVENTIONS: Trophoblast was examined by immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR, and serum was analyzed by ELISA. RESULTS: PIGF was localized to the cytotrophoblast cells. Expression of PIGF mRNA was reduced in trophoblast isolated from women with ectopic compared with intrauterine pregnancies (P < 0.05). Serum PIGF was undetectable in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies and reduced, or undetectable, in miscarriage compared with viable intrauterine pregnancies (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum PIGF is a promising novel diagnostic biomarker for early pregnancy location and outcome, and large-scale studies are now required to determine its clinical utility.
CONTEXT: Tubal ectopic pregnancy is common, but accurate diagnosis is difficult and costly. There is currently no serum test to differentiate tubal from intrauterine implantation, and an effective biomarker of ectopic pregnancy would be a major clinical advance. OBJECTIVE: A key feature of successful intrauterine implantation is the establishment of a supportive vascular network, and this has been associated with the activity of placental growth factor (PIGF). We hypothesized that the local decidual environment facilitates PIGF-dependent angiogenesis and that this pathway is not active in tubal implantation. We aimed to determine whether tubal implantation is manifest by an attenuation of the normal trophoblast PIGF response and whether serum PIGF levels are different in ectopic compared with intrauterine pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Tissue and serum analysis was done at a large United Kingdom teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Tissue and sera were collected from gestation-matched pregnant women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy (viable intrauterine) (n = 15), evacuation of uterus for embryonic missed miscarriage (nonviable intrauterine) (n = 10) and surgery for tubal ectopic pregnancy (n = 15). INTERVENTIONS: Trophoblast was examined by immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR, and serum was analyzed by ELISA. RESULTS: PIGF was localized to the cytotrophoblast cells. Expression of PIGF mRNA was reduced in trophoblast isolated from women with ectopic compared with intrauterine pregnancies (P < 0.05). Serum PIGF was undetectable in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies and reduced, or undetectable, in miscarriage compared with viable intrauterine pregnancies (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum PIGF is a promising novel diagnostic biomarker for early pregnancy location and outcome, and large-scale studies are now required to determine its clinical utility.
Authors: Kristy Red-Horse; Yan Zhou; Olga Genbacev; Akraporn Prakobphol; Russell Foulk; Michael McMaster; Susan J Fisher Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Richard J Levine; Sharon E Maynard; Cong Qian; Kee-Hak Lim; Lucinda J England; Kai F Yu; Enrique F Schisterman; Ravi Thadhani; Benjamin P Sachs; Franklin H Epstein; Baha M Sibai; Vikas P Sukhatme; S Ananth Karumanchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Po Mui Lam; Christine Briton-Jones; Che Kwok Cheung; See Wai Leung; Lai Ping Cheung; Christopher Haines Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Bruno M Polliotti; A Gordon Fry; Devereux N Saller; Robert A Mooney; Christopher Cox; Richard K Miller Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Samantha F Butts; Peter Takacs; Karine Chung; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 7.329