Literature DB >> 2104792

Duration of protective effect of terbutaline sulfate and cromolyn sodium alone and in combination on exercise-induced asthma.

M Woolley1, S D Anderson, B M Quigley.   

Abstract

For subjects with EIA participating in physical activities throughout the day, prolonged duration of protection is desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine whether in EIA a combination of the recommended aerosol doses of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor agonist, terbutaline sulfate (0.5 mg), and cromolyn sodium (disodium cromoglycate; 2 mg) provides longer protection against EIA than either drug alone. On four separate days, following the administration of either placebo, terbutaline alone, cromolyn sodium alone or terbutaline and cromolyn sodium together, 12 subjects (seven men and five women; aged 18 to 28 years) with EIA performed four identical eight minute treadmill runs, each separated by two-hour intervals. Drug treatments were given double-blind, with the order counterbalanced using a Latin-square design. Pulmonary function was recorded before the drug, immediately before and after exercise, and at 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after exercise. Inspired ventilation, heart rate, and environmental conditions were monitored during exercise. A two-way analysis of variance was performed to investigate the main effects of time and drug treatment. Results indicated that in comparison with placebo, EIA was significantly reduced by either cromolyn sodium or terbutaline administered up to two hours (p less than 0.01) and by the combination (cromolyn sodium and terbutaline) up to four hours after inhalation (p less than 0.05). No significant differences were found between the combination and terbutaline during the initial two hours (p less than 0.5). We conclude that a combination of beta 2-adrenergic receptor agonist and cromolyn sodium is the treatment of choice for prolonged effective protection from EIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2104792     DOI: 10.1378/chest.97.1.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

1.  Exercise-induced asthma.

Authors:  E Milgrom
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-05

Review 2.  Exercise-induced asthma. What family physicians should do.

Authors:  A D'Urzo
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Exercise-induced asthma in children.

Authors:  John Massie
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Beta2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma.

Authors:  Sandra D Anderson; Corinne Caillaud; John D Brannan
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 5.  Methods for "indirect" challenge tests including exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, and hypertonic aerosols.

Authors:  Sandra D Anderson; John D Brannan
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Prevention of exercise induced asthma by inhaled salmeterol xinafoate.

Authors:  C P Green; J F Price
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future.

Authors:  Sandra D Anderson; John D Brannan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Effects of Sodium Cromoglycate on Iranian Asthmatic Subjects Without Exposure to any Bronchoconstrictor agent.

Authors:  Tajmah Mombeini; Mohammad Reza Zahedpoure-Anaraki; Ahmad Reza Dehpour
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.696

Review 9.  Mast-cell stabilising agents to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

Authors:  C H Spooner; G R Spooner; B H Rowe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.