Literature DB >> 21047630

Proximal ectopic pregnancy: a descriptive general population-based study and results of different management options in 86 cases.

Demetrio Larraín1, Francesca Marengo, Nicolas Bourdel, Patricia Jaffeux, Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier, Jean-Luc Pouly, Gerard Mage, Benoit Rabischong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe different approaches for diagnosis and management of proximal ectopic pregnancies (PP) in general population.
DESIGN: Observational population based-study.
SETTING: Regional ectopic pregnancy registry. PATIENT(S): Eighty-six PP registered from 1992 to 2008. INTERVENTION(S): Surgical (radical or conservative), medical, or combined therapies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Epidemiologic characteristics, clinical presentation, hCG level, treatments performed, failure rate, and recurrence. RESULT(S): Mean gestational age was 48.2 days. Estimated incidence of PP was 2.7%. Abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding were the commonest symptoms. Two patients were admitted in hypovolemic shock. Diagnostic modalities included transvaginal ultrasound, abdominal ultrasonography, and laparoscopy in 38 (44%), 7 (8%), and 39 (45%) cases, respectively. Mean hCG level was 10,759 IU/L. Thirty-four patients underwent primary cornual resection (39.5%) by laparoscopy (n = 32) or laparotomy (n = 2). Twenty-seven patients (31.4%) underwent primary conservative surgery by laparoscopy: cornuostomy (n = 18) or extended salpigostomy (n = 9). Primary medical treatment with methotrexate was attempted in 14 patients (16.3%). Expectant management was attempted in one case (1.2%). Eleven cases received combined therapies (11.6%). Failure rates for medical and surgical treatments were 35.7% and 28%, respectively. No failures were noted among patients who received combined therapies. CONCLUSION(S): Proximal ectopic pregnancy remains a life-threatening condition. Diagnosis is challenging and requires a high index of suspicion. Despite available conservative strategies, management of PP remains heterogeneous.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047630     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Interstitial pregnancy rupture at 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Authors:  Célia Pedroso; Rita Lermann; Njila Amaral; Pedro Condeço
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-08-25

2.  Diagnosis and Management of 'Cornual' Pregnancies from 2002 to 2015 at a Tertiary Referral Centre in South India: Insights from Introspection.

Authors:  Vijaya B Bayyarapu; Sirisha R Gundabattula
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-03-24

3.  Misdiagnosed uterine rupture of an advanced cornual pregnancy.

Authors:  Christian Linus Hastrup Sant; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Case Rep Radiol       Date:  2012-04-03

4.  Clinical characteristics of persistent ectopic pregnancy after salpingostomy and influence on ongoing pregnancy.

Authors:  Yongli Zhang; Jinhong Chen; Wen Lu; Bilan Li; Guiqiang Du; Xiaoping Wan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Interstitial Pregnancy in the Third Trimester with Severe Preeclampsia: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Shiho Nagayama; Hironori Takahashi; Shohei Tozawa; Risa Narumi; Rie Usui; Akihide Ohkuchi; Shigeki Matsubara
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05-12

6.  Interstitial pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer following bilateral salpingectomy: report of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Garavaglia; Lavinia Quaranta; Anna Redaelli; Gabriella Colombo; Federica Pasi; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.