Literature DB >> 21047490

Everolimus for the second-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell cancer: a critique of the submission from Novartis.

M Pitt1, L Crathorne, T Moxham, M Bond, C Hyde.   

Abstract

This paper represents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of everolimus plus best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) which has progressed following or on vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy (sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab), compared to BSC alone. The submitting manufacturer's case for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness was mainly based on a well-conducted randomised controlled trial (RCT), Renal Cell Cancer Treatment with Oral RAD001 Given Daily-1 (RECORD-1), comparing BSC plus everolimus with BSC plus placebo and a de novo economic model. The RCT indicated a marked statistically significant effect on progression-free survival. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimate was 52,000 pounds per quality-adjusted life-year (this included a reduction in drug cost associated with an approved patient access scheme). The ERG undertook a critical appraisal of the submission. The ERG was generally in agreement with the submitting manufacturer concerning its estimates of effectiveness; however, there was greater concern surrounding the estimates of cost-effectiveness. The ERG judged that if potential errors in the model were corrected, the ICERs offered by the submitting manufacturer would overstate the cost-effectiveness of everolimus for the second-line treatment of metastatic RCC (that this ICER would be a higher value). Concerning the estimates of cost-effectiveness in RCC, the observations in the ERG report provide strong further support for research collecting rigorous estimates of utilities associated with the main health states likely to be experienced by patients with renal cell cancer. At the time of writing, NICE was yet to issue the Appraisal Consultation Document for this appraisal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047490     DOI: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  3 in total

Review 1.  Everolimus in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Sebastiano Buti; Alessandro Leonetti; Alice Dallatomasina; Melissa Bersanelli
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Estimated generic prices of cancer medicines deemed cost-ineffective in England: a cost estimation analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Hill; Christopher Redd; Dzintars Gotham; Isabelle Erbacher; Jonathan Meldrum; Ryo Harada
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Clinical experience and critical evaluation of the role of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Jan Schmitges; Claudio Jeldres; Shahrokh F Shariat; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2011-04-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.