OBJECTIVES: To identify the determinants of dental care utilisation among Greek adults, with a particular emphasis on socio-economic determinants. METHODS: Data were collected through a national survey on health and health care services utilisation of a sample of 4,003 Greek adults stratified by geographic region, age and gender. A purpose made questionnaire was used during face-to-face interviews. A 2-stage model was developed to assess the impact of independent variables on dental utilisation likelihood and frequency. RESULTS: 39.6% (1,562) of Greek adults reported having visited a dentist within the last year. Among dental attenders, 32.6% reported prevention as the reason for visit. Statistically significant differences in dental care utilisation were observed in relation to demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age, income, education, place of residence, private insurance coverage and self-rated oral health are important determinants of dental services utilisation. Mean number of dental visits within previous year was 1.6. Results from Poisson regression analysis indicated that lower income level correlates to lower number of dental visits, while having visited for treatment (rather than for prevention) correlated to higher number of dental visits. CONCLUSIONS: Greek adults do not exhibit satisfactory dental visiting behaviour. Extent of care sought is associated with need for treatment rather than preventive reasons. The findings confirm the existence of socioeconomic inequalities in dental services utilisation among Greek adults.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the determinants of dental care utilisation among Greek adults, with a particular emphasis on socio-economic determinants. METHODS: Data were collected through a national survey on health and health care services utilisation of a sample of 4,003 Greek adults stratified by geographic region, age and gender. A purpose made questionnaire was used during face-to-face interviews. A 2-stage model was developed to assess the impact of independent variables on dental utilisation likelihood and frequency. RESULTS: 39.6% (1,562) of Greek adults reported having visited a dentist within the last year. Among dental attenders, 32.6% reported prevention as the reason for visit. Statistically significant differences in dental care utilisation were observed in relation to demographic, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age, income, education, place of residence, private insurance coverage and self-rated oral health are important determinants of dental services utilisation. Mean number of dental visits within previous year was 1.6. Results from Poisson regression analysis indicated that lower income level correlates to lower number of dental visits, while having visited for treatment (rather than for prevention) correlated to higher number of dental visits. CONCLUSIONS: Greek adults do not exhibit satisfactory dental visiting behaviour. Extent of care sought is associated with need for treatment rather than preventive reasons. The findings confirm the existence of socioeconomic inequalities in dental services utilisation among Greek adults.
Authors: Janko Janković; Sladjana Šiljak; Miloš Erić; Jelena Marinković; Slavenka Janković Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Laia Palència; Albert Espelt; Marco Cornejo-Ovalle; Carme Borrell Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Jorge-A Palacio-Vieira; Ester Villalonga-Olives; Jose María Valderas; Michael Herdman; Jordi Alonso; Luis Rajmil Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.380