Literature DB >> 21046544

A comparison of two methods for preventing cross-contamination when using flexible fiberoptic endoscopes in an otolaryngology clinic: disposable sterile sheaths versus immersion in germicidal liquid.

Alphi Elackattu1, Mary Zoccoli, Jeffrey H Spiegel, Kenneth M Grundfast.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the efficacy of using a sterile sheath to prevent cross-contamination when using a fiberoptic nasopharnygolaryngoscope (FNPL) in an otolaryngology clinic. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective controlled trial.
METHODS: All FNPLs were disinfected according to applicable current guidelines recommended by the US Center for Disease Control. Swabs were taken from multiple sites on 100 FNPLs for cultures to detect the presence of bacteria, viruses, or both. Each FNPL was then assigned to either the sheath alone (experimental) or germicidal immersion (control) group. After using an FNPL in a patient, swabs were again taken so that a comparison could be made in microbes on the scopes. Throughout the study, the steps in the disinfection process taken by medical assistants as they worked with the FNPLs were observed and recorded.
RESULTS: Microbial counts on insertion shafts of FNLPs for the sheath and immersion groups were similar, with 1/50 versus 0/50, respectively. Time spent using the sheath method averaged 89 seconds, whereas immersion in the germicidal liquid took 14 minutes. No breaches in adherence to applicable protocols were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Using an individually packaged disposable sterile sheath on a FNLP prevents microbes from adhering to the shaft of the scope, thus providing a reasonably safe method of avoiding the transmission of infection from one patient to the next patient when using an FNLP successively in multiple patients in an otolaryngology clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046544     DOI: 10.1002/lary.21146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  Transnasal flexible esophagoscopy (TNE): an evaluation of the patient's experience and time management.

Authors:  Alexandra Streckfuss; Nikolaus Bosch; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Distal chip versus fiberoptic laryngoscopy using endoscopic sheaths: diagnostic accuracy and image quality.

Authors:  Boudewijn E C Plaat; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan Wedman; György B Halmos; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The effect of endoscopic sheaths on visualization in distal chip and fiberoptic laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Boudewijn E C Plaat; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan Wedman; György B Halmos; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Efficacy of Disinfection of Rigid Endoscope by Ethyl Alcohol 70.

Authors:  Marco Cesar J Santos; Henrique F Pauna; Kazuko U Graziano; Richard L Voegels
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 5.  Patient safety in otolaryngology: a descriptive review.

Authors:  Julian Danino; Jameel Muzaffar; Chris Metcalfe; Chris Coulson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Experimental Study to Develop a Method for Improving Sample Collection to Monitor Laryngoscopes after Reprocessing.

Authors:  Savina Ditommaso; Monica Giacomuzzi; Elisa Ricciardi; Carla Zotti
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-08-21

7.  Evaluating the Quality of Rigid Optic Videolaryngoscopy Image Taken Through Dental Protection Cap and Its Feasibility as Additional Barrier Method Against COVID-19.

Authors:  Mariana Nagata Cavalheiro; Vinicius Ribas Fonseca; Bianca Simone Zeigelboim; Diego F Costa; Lucas Viomar de Lima; Marlon Kleber Bozzo; Rita de Cássia Tonochi; Bruno Ceron Hartmann
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.