Literature DB >> 21046538

A clinical review of 9 years of free perforator flap breast reconstructions: an analysis of 675 flaps and the influence of new techniques on clinical practice.

Rafael Acosta1, Jeroen M Smit, Thorir Audolfsson, Catharine M Darcy, Morteza Enajat, Morten Kildal, Anders G Liss.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review our 9-year experience with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstructions to help others more easily overcome the pitfalls we experienced. A chart review was conducted for all 543 patients who had 622 DIEP breast reconstructions in our clinic between January 2000 and January 2009. In this time, there were an additional 28 superior gluteal artery perforator and 25 superficial inferior epigastric artery reconstructions, bringing the total free flap reconstructions to 675. In the early years, the success rate was 90.7%, the average operative time was 7 hours and 18 minutes, and the complication rate was 33.3%; these have improved to 98.2%, 4 hours and 8 minutes, and 19.3%, respectively. We describe our selection criteria, preoperative vascular mapping, surgical techniques, and postoperative monitoring as they relate to these improvements in outcome, operative time, and complications. The DIEP flap is a safe and reliable option in breast reconstructions. By acquiring experience with the flap and introducing new and improving existing techniques we have improved the ease of the procedure and the success rate and have shortened the operative time. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21046538     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  8 in total

1.  Breast Microsurgery in Plastic Surgery Literature: A 21-Year Analysis of Publication Trends.

Authors:  Lauren Tracy Daly; Donald Mowlds; Merrick A Brodsky; Michael Abrouk; Jessica R Gandy; Garrett A Wirth
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 2.  [Microsurgical techniques for breast reconstruction].

Authors:  M Pelzer; M A Reichenberger; G Germann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

4.  Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes After DIEP Breast Reconstruction at a Low-Volume Community Hospital Without Microvascular Fellowship Training.

Authors:  Kenneth K Kao; Scott M Nishikawa; Paul D Faringer
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 5.  [Application and prospect of preoperative computed tomographic angiography in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction].

Authors:  Wen Peng; Chunliu Lü; Bo Zhou; Dajiang Song; Zan Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-07-15

6.  Equilibrium-phase high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T in preoperative imaging for perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Bas Versluis; Stefania Tuinder; Carla Boetes; René Van Der Hulst; Arno Lataster; Tom Van Mulken; Joachim Wildberger; Michiel de Haan; Tim Leiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Flap surgical techniques for incisional hernia recurrences. A swine experimental model.

Authors:  Florina Popa; Filip Ardelean; Cosmin Pestean; Robert Purdoiu; Oana Rosca; Alexandru Georgescu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2017-04-25

8.  Liberal versus Modified Intraoperative Fluid Management in Abdominal-flap Breast Reconstructions. A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Thomas Sjöberg; Anmar Numan; Louis de Weerd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.