Literature DB >> 21045721

Assessment of coronary stenosis, plaque burden and remodeling by multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease.

Giovanni B Pedrazzini1, Ilaria D'angeli, Giuseppe Vassalli, Francesco F Faletra, Catherine Klersy, Elena Pasotti, Carlo Corbacelli, Tiziano Moccetti, Angelo Auricchio.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for assessment of coronary lesions in patients referred for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 57 patients (48 men; mean age: 63 ± 10 years) who underwent 64-slice MDCT because of atypical chest pain, stable angina, or ECG abnormalities and were diagnosed with CAD. All patients subsequently underwent QCA and IVUS. We analyzed 102 coronary lesions using the three techniques. Measurements of luminal area stenosis and cross-sectional area by MDCT (72.9 ± 7.0% and 4.5 ± 1.8 mm, respectively) were in good agreement with those by IVUS [72.7 ± 6.7% and 4.5 ± 1.6 mm, respectively; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient r = 0.847; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.792-0.902 and r = 0.931; 95% CI = 0.906-0.956, respectively] but not QCA (r = 0.115; 95% CI = 0.040-0.189 and r = 0.433; 95% CI = 0.291-0.576, respectively). Plaque cross-sectional area and plaque volume measured by MDCT (12.4 ± 3.8 mm and 104.7 ± 52.8 microl, respectively) were in good agreement with those by IVUS (12.2 ± 3.7 mm and 102.8 ± 54.1 microl; r = 0.913; 95% CI = 0.880-0.945 and r = 0.979; 95% CI = 0.969-0.990, respectively). Remodeling index measurements by MDCT (1.22 ± 0.22) were in good agreement with those by IVUS (r = 0.876; 95% CI = 0.831-0.922). Positive remodeling occurred in 63% of stenoses.
CONCLUSION: MDCT allows accurate noninvasive assessment of coronary stenosis, plaque burden and remodeling in patients referred for suspected CAD. Positive remodeling is a frequent finding in stable lesions. 2011 Italian Federation of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21045721     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283403955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  4 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression: Status of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis.

Authors:  Tobias A Fuchs; Michael Fiechter; Cathérine Gebhard; Julia Stehli; Jelena R Ghadri; Egle Kazakauskaite; Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Plaque assessment by coronary CT.

Authors:  Bálint Szilveszter; Csilla Celeng; Pál Maurovich-Horvat
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Innovative Approaches to Assess Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk Subjects: A Review From Clinical to Metabolomics Strategies.

Authors:  Aline M A Martins; Mariana U B Paiva; Diego V N Paiva; Raphaela M de Oliveira; Henrique L Machado; Leonardo J S R Alves; Carolina R C Picossi; Andréa T Faccio; Marina F M Tavares; Coral Barbas; Viviane Z R Giraldez; Raul D Santos; Guilherme U Monte; Fernando A Atik
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.