Literature DB >> 2104551

Comparison of the erbium-yttrium aluminum garnet and carbon dioxide lasers for in vitro bone and cartilage ablation.

C Gonzalez1, W P van de Merwe, M Smith, L Reinisch.   

Abstract

The in vitro bone- and cartilage-ablation characteristics of the solid-state erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser were compared to those of the carbon dioxide laser. Ablations of fresh, frozen cadaver septal cartilage and maxillary sinus bone were performed using total energies between 1 and 6 J. Specimens were studied using hematoxylin and eosin stain and digitized, computer-assisted measurements of 35-mm photographs. Erbium-yttrium aluminum garnet-ablated bone averaged 5 microns of adjacent tissue thermal injury, compared with 67 microns with carbon dioxide-ablated bone. Erbium-yttrium aluminum garnet-ablated cartilage averaged 2 microns of adjacent tissue thermal injury, compared with 21 microns with the carbon dioxide-ablated cartilage. The tissue-ablation characteristics of the erbium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser are promising for future otolaryngologic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2104551     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199001000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  [Holmium:YAG and erbium:YAG infrared laser osteotomy].

Authors:  M Kautzky; M Susani; M Leukauf; P Schenk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

2.  Comparative histological analysis of bone healing of standardized bone defects performed with the Er:YAG laser and steel burs.

Authors:  Elaine Duarte Artuso de Mello; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Egberto Munin; Manoel Sant'Ana Filho; Guilherme Paulo Scarpel de Mello; Emília Angela Loschiavo Arisawa; Marília Gerhardt de Oliveira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Laser vs bur for bone cutting in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deepak Passi; Uma Shankar Pal; Shadab Mohammad; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Divya Mehrotra; Geeta Singh; Manoj Kumar; Arul A L Chellappa; Chandan Gupta
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-04-06

4.  New implant designs for fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; J Seebeck; R Frei; B Frenz; I Antoniadis; E Schneider
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Use of piezoelectric surgery and Er:YAG laser:which one is more effective during impacted third molar surgery?

Authors:  Seied Omid Keyhan; Hamid Reza Fallahi; Behzad Cheshmi; Sajad Mokhtari; Dana Zandian; Parisa Yousefi
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08-06

6.  Efficiency of Laser versus Bur in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.

Authors:  Niladri Maiti; Piyush Sharma; Samiksha Singh Jadon; Fida Qadri; V R Chandra Babu Pamidi; Sagar Ramesh Ganvir; Rahul V C Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

7.  Advances in bone surgery: the Er:YAG laser in oral surgery and implant dentistry.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2010-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.