Literature DB >> 21044827

Histological findings in soft tissues around temporomandibular joint prostheses after up to eight years of function.

A Westermark1, C Leiggener, E Aagaard, S Lindskog.   

Abstract

Early temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prostheses articulated on material with poor wear resistance. Wear debris was deposited in the surrounding tissues, causing severe foreign body cell reactions. Recent TMJ prostheses use modern orthopaedic materials, such as ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for the fossa component, and cobalt-chromium, or cobalt-chromium-molybdenum for the condylar head. These designs are reliable in long-term follow-up studies. The authors report histological findings in soft tissue samples obtained from around two types of TMJ prostheses after up to 8 years of function. The devices were four Biomet (Biomet Microfixation, Jacksonville, FL, USA), and two TMJ Concepts (TMJ Concepts, Ventura, CA, USA). All joint capsule samples demonstrated dense, fibrous connective tissue with no inflammatory cells or foreign body reactions. The joint disc tissues showed even denser fibrous connective tissue, free from inflammatory reactions. Some samples from the junction between capsule and disk demonstrated synovial-like tissue. The observations reported in this paper indicate that modern TMJ prostheses with Cr-Co-Mb or Cr-Co articular condyles articulating on UHMWPE fossa components appear to function without foreign body reactions in he surrounding tissues.
Copyright © 2010 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044827     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  [Progress of temporomandibular joint prosthesis].

Authors:  Quan Sun; Kaide Li; Lei Liu
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2014-08

Review 2.  Advancements in temporomandibular joint total joint replacements (TMJR).

Authors:  Siva Kumar Mamidi; Kristin Klutcharch; Shradha Rao; Julio C M Souza; Louis G Mercuri; Mathew T Mathew
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 3.  Alloplastic or autogenous reconstruction of the TMJ.

Authors:  Andrew J Sidebottom
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-09-06

4.  Design and Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific Total Temporomandibular Joint Implants.

Authors:  Shirish M Ingawale; Tarun Goswami
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement using stock prosthesis: a one-year follow-up report of two cases.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Lee; Da-Jung Ryu; Hye-Sun Kim; Hyung-Gon Kim; Jong-Ki Huh
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-12-23

6.  Evaluation of Total Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement in TMJ Ankylosis.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Roy Chowdhury; Vivek Saxena; Krishnaprabhu Rajkumar; Rengasayee Arunkumar Shadamarshan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-07-27

7.  Evaluation of total alloplastic temporo-mandibular joint replacement with two different types of prostheses: A three-year prospective study.

Authors:  L-M Gonzalez-Perez; B Gonzalez-Perez-Somarriba; G Centeno; C Vallellano; J-F Montes-Carmona
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 8.  Clinical guidelines for total temporomandibular joint replacement.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yoda; Nobumi Ogi; Hiroyuki Yoshitake; Tetsuji Kawakami; Ritsuo Takagi; Kenichiro Murakami; Hidemichi Yuasa; Toshirou Kondoh; Kanchu Tei; Kenichi Kurita
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.