OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of home- and community-based postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of program evaluation data for treatment completers and noncompleters. SETTING: Home- and community-based PABIR conducted in 7 geographically distinct U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=489) with traumatic brain injury who completed the prescribed course of rehabilitation (completed-course-of-treatment [CCT] group) compared with 114 who were discharged precipitously before program completion (precipitous-discharge [PD] group). INTERVENTION: PABIR delivered in home and community settings by certified professional staff on an individualized basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) completed by means of professional consensus on admission and at discharge; MPAI-4 Participation Index at 3- and 12-month follow-up through telephone contact. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance (CCT vs PD group as between-subjects variable, admission MPAI-4 score as covariate) showed significant differences between groups at discharge on the full MPAI-4 (F=82.25; P<.001), Ability Index (F=50.24; P<.001), Adjustment Index (F=81.20; P<.001), and Participation Index (F=59.48; P<.001). A large portion of the sample was lost to follow-up; however, available data showed that group differences remained statistically significant at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results provided evidence of the effectiveness of home- and community-based PABIR and that treatment effects were maintained at follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of home- and community-based postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of program evaluation data for treatment completers and noncompleters. SETTING: Home- and community-based PABIR conducted in 7 geographically distinct U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=489) with traumatic brain injury who completed the prescribed course of rehabilitation (completed-course-of-treatment [CCT] group) compared with 114 who were discharged precipitously before program completion (precipitous-discharge [PD] group). INTERVENTION: PABIR delivered in home and community settings by certified professional staff on an individualized basis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) completed by means of professional consensus on admission and at discharge; MPAI-4 Participation Index at 3- and 12-month follow-up through telephone contact. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance (CCT vs PD group as between-subjects variable, admission MPAI-4 score as covariate) showed significant differences between groups at discharge on the full MPAI-4 (F=82.25; P<.001), Ability Index (F=50.24; P<.001), Adjustment Index (F=81.20; P<.001), and Participation Index (F=59.48; P<.001). A large portion of the sample was lost to follow-up; however, available data showed that group differences remained statistically significant at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results provided evidence of the effectiveness of home- and community-based PABIR and that treatment effects were maintained at follow-up.
Authors: Aviva Beit Yosef; Nirit Refaeli; Jeremy M Jacobs; Jeffrey Shames; Yafit Gilboa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Dónal G Fortune; R Stephen Walsh; Brian Waldron; Caroline McGrath; Maurice Harte; Sarah Casey; Brian McClean Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2015-09-08