Literature DB >> 21044688

Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence.

Markus F Neumann1, Tarik N Mohamed, Stefan R Schweinberger.   

Abstract

According to the perceptual load theory, processing of a task-irrelevant distractor is abolished when attentional resources are fully consumed by task-relevant material. As an exception, however, famous faces have been shown to elicit repetition modulations in event-related potentials - an N250r - despite high load at initial presentation, suggesting preserved face-encoding. Here, we recorded N250r repetition modulations by unfamiliar faces, hands, and houses, and tested face specificity of preserved encoding under high load. In an immediate (S1-S2) repetition priming paradigm, participants performed a letter identification task on S1 by indicating whether an "X" vs. "N" was among 6 different (high load condition) or 6 identical (low load condition) letters. Letter strings were superimposed on distractor faces, hands, or houses. Subsequent S2 probes were either identical repetitions of S1 distractors, non-repeated exemplars from the same category, or infrequent butterflies, to which participants responded. Independent of attentional load at S1, an occipito-temporal N250r was found for unfamiliar faces. In contrast, no repetition-related neural modulation emerged for houses or hands. This strongly suggests that a putative face-selective attention module supports encoding under high load, and that similar mechanisms are unavailable for other natural or artificial objects.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044688     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Influence of lag length on repetition priming in emotional stimuli: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Delin Zhang; Aiqing Nie; Zhixuan Wang; Mengsi Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

5.  Sensory competition in the face processing areas of the human brain.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: a replication and extension.

Authors:  Laura Kaltwasser; Andrea Hildebrandt; Guillermo Recio; Oliver Wilhelm; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Face-specific capacity limits under perceptual load do not depend on holistic processing.

Authors:  Volker Thoma
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

Review 8.  Brain Signals of Face Processing as Revealed by Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Ela I Olivares; Jaime Iglesias; Cristina Saavedra; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Mitchell Valdés-Sosa
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Object-based attentional selection modulates anticipatory alpha oscillations.

Authors:  Balázs Knakker; Béla Weiss; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players' brain.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Nicola Crotti; Mirella Manfredi; Roberta Adorni; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.