Literature DB >> 21044376

Penile prosthesis implantation in an academic institution in Latin America.

Mario Paranhos1, Enrico Andrade, Alberto A Antunes, Ana L N Barbieri, Joaquim A Claro, Miguel Srougi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective study to analyze the effectiveness of implantable penile prostheses in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 249 patients who received implants between 2001 and 2008. A total of 139 patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation were interviewed.
RESULTS: Approximately half of patients had previously used oral drugs before implantation of the prosthesis. About 45% had diabetes, 25.9% had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), and 64% had hypertension. Exchange was performed in 5.7% for fracture, inadequate size, or extrusion. A total of 24.5% of men had immediate postoperative pain, 7.9% had local infection, and 8.6% had other complications. Patients who had previously undergone RP were 3.2 times more likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients who had not (p = 0.061). Eighty-nine (64%) patients returned to having sex as they had before being diagnosed with ED. Ninety-two of the men (66.2%) had sexual intercourse one to two times per week. One hundred twenty patients (86.3%) rated their level of satisfaction as good, excellent or very good, which was similar to the percentage of partners. The mean follow-up was 40 months.
CONCLUSION: Higher rates of postoperative infections and mechanical problems with the implant were found in this study as compared to other studies, which was probably associated with the relative lack of experience of the trainees who were performing the surgeries. Patients with a history of RP or diabetes mellitus prior to implantation were at higher risk of postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044376     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000500009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  3 in total

1.  [A cylinder aneurysm of a penile prosthesis].

Authors:  J Pannek; P Bartel; K Göcking
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Multiple Site Fracture of Both Rods in a Malleable Penile Implant.

Authors:  Marcelo Almeida Pinheiro; Haroldo Brasil Barroso Filho; Francisco José Cabral Mesquita; Ivon Teixeira de Souza; Rafael Silva Guimarães; Everaldo Moura Santos; Rômulo Augusto da Silveira; Rommel Prata Regadas; Geraldo Munguba Macedo
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-03-15

Review 3.  Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Jose A Saavedra-Belaunde; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.