Literature DB >> 21044189

The effects of different oral care protocols on mucosal change in orally intubated patients from an intensive care unit.

Shu-Pen Hsu1, Chao-Sheng Liao, Chung-Yi Li, Ai-Fu Chiou.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of three different oral care protocols in intubated patients.
BACKGROUND: Although oral care is important to improve the oral mucosa integrity in intubated patients, there are few evidence-based nursing protocols to deal with this problem in critical care units.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental design was employed for this study.
METHODS: Eighty-one orally intubated patients recruited from the intensive care unit of a medical centre in northern Taiwan were employed in this study. Patients were divided into three treatment groups: a control group (n = 27), green tea group (n = 29) and boiled water group (n = 25). Oral mucosal status was monitored using a rating scale for 14 days. All data were analysed by the sas software (version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) using descriptive statistics, the Kruskal-Wallis H test and generalised estimating equation regression models.
RESULTS: Severity of mucosal change was significantly less on six subscales (labial mucosa, tongue mucosa, gingival colour, gingivitis, salivary status and amount of dental plaque) in the boiled water group than the control group (p < 0·05). In addition, severity was significantly less on two subscales (salivary status and amount of dental plaque) in the green tea group than the control group (p < 0·05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both boiled water and green tea oral care protocols may improve mucosal status of orally intubated patients. Mucosal status was significantly more improved by oral care with boiled water than by oral care with green tea. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Because oral care plays an important role in improving mucosal status, nurses are urged to find new effective oral care methods to further reduce the occurrence of oropharyngeal colonisation and ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044189     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03515.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of different methods for removing oral biofilm in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Maria Sonia Oliveira; Alvaro Henrique Borges; Fernanda Zanol Mattos; Tereza Aparecida Della Vedove Semenoff; Alex Semenoff Segundo; Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto; Matheus Coêlho Bandeca; Alessandra Nogueira Porto
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 2.  Camellia Sinensis Mouthwashes in Oral Care: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ali Tafazoli; Ehsan Tafazoli Moghadam
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2020-12

3.  Lack of direct association between oral mucosal lesions and SARS-CoV- 2 in a cohort of patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

Authors:  Gabriela Schwab; Michelle Palmieri; Rodrigo M Zerbinati; Dmitry J S Sarmento; Thais Reis; Karem L Ortega; Italo T Kano; Rafael A V Caixeta; Bengt Hasséus; Dipak Sapkota; Roger Junges; Simone Giannecchini; André L F Costa; Sumatra M C P Jales; José A L Lindoso; Camila Barros Gallo; Paulo H Braz-Silva
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.474

4.  Exploring the Nursing Factors Related to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Yanling Yin; Meirong Sun; Zhe Li; Jingjing Bu; Yuhong Chen; Kun Zhang; Zhenjie Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.