Literature DB >> 21044164

Novel ceramic bone replacement material Osbone® in a comparative in vitro study with osteoblasts.

Anne Bernhardt1, Anja Lode, Fabian Peters, Michael Gelinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a very common ceramic material for bone replacement due to its similarity in composition to the mineral phase of natural bone. A recently developed bone graft material is Osbone(®), a synthetic HA ceramic available as porous granules with different sizes and block forms. The goal of this study was to characterise Osbone(®) in vitro in comparison to the already established calcium phosphate-based bone grafts Cerasorb M(®) and Bio-Oss(®).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adhesion and proliferation of SaOS-2 osteoblasts were evaluated quantitatively by determining DNA content and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, MTT cell vitality staining was performed to confirm the attachment of viable cells to the different materials. Osteogenic differentiation of the cells was evaluated by means of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity quantification as well as by gene expression analysis of osteogenic markers using reverse transcriptase PCR.
RESULTS: MTT staining after 1 day of adhesion showed viable cells on all examined materials. DNA content and LDH activity revealed proliferation of osteoblasts on Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®), but not on Bio-Oss(®) during cultivation over 28 days. SEM showed a well-spread morphology of cells attached to both Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®). We detected an increase of specific ALP activity during cultivation of osteoblasts on Osbone(®) and Cerasorb M(®) as well as expression of the bone-related genes ALP, osteonectin, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein II on both materials.
CONCLUSIONS: Osbone(®) granules support proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro and are therefore promising candidates for in vivo applications.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044164     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentation using beta tricalcium phosphate and demineralized bone matrix: A comparative study.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Shalash; Hatem A Rahman; Amr A Azim; Amani H Neemat; Hesham E Hawary; Sherine A Nasry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Evaluation of inorganic bovine bone graft in periodontal defects after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Daniela Guimaraes de Melo; Thiago de Santana Santos; Felipe Perraro Sehn; Emanuel Dias de Oliveira E Silva; Paulo Ricardo Saquete Martins-Filho; Ana Cláudia Amorim Gomes Dourado
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

3.  Preparation and characterization of cockle shell aragonite nanocomposite porous 3D scaffolds for bone repair.

Authors:  Saffanah Khuder Mahmood; Md Zuki Abu Bakar Zakaria; Intan Shameha Binti Abdul Razak; Loqman Mohamed Yusof; Alhaji Zubair Jaji; Isa Tijani; Nahidah Ibrahim Hammadi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2017-04-23

4.  Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality.

Authors:  Alexander Rasch; Hendrik Naujokat; Fanlu Wang; Andreas Seekamp; Sabine Fuchs; Tim Klüter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mega-oss and Mega-TCP versus Bio-Oss granules fixed by alginate gel for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Tong-Yue Wang; Shu-Lan Xu; Zhi-Ping Wang; Jin-Yuan Guo
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2020-08-11

6.  In Vitro Cytokine Expression and In Vivo Healing and Inflammatory Response to a Collagen-Coated Synthetic Bone Filler.

Authors:  Daniele Bollati; Marco Morra; Clara Cassinelli; Saturnino Marco Lupi; Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique-Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull.

Authors:  Punyada Intapibool; Naruporn Monmaturapoj; Katanchalee Nampuksa; Kriangkrai Thongkorn; Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.