Literature DB >> 21042955

Value of combined detection of AFU and TCH in differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites.

Hong Zhang1, Feng Li, Qun Wei, Yu-Fei Zhu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to accurately evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of combined detection of ascitic fluid alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) and cholesterol (TCH) compared with that of their individual detection. We assayed ascitic AFU activity by colorimetry and TCH level by CHOD-PAP method simultaneously in all 213 cases. Then, we assessed the value of combined detection of AFU and TCH activities with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), including diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predict value(PV+), negative predict value(PV-) to see whether these two ascitic fluid biochemical examinations might help in differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites. The mean values of AFU and TCH in malignant group [(164.96 ± 87.72) μmol/lh and (1.65 ± 1.00) mmol/l, respectively] were significantly higher than those in non-tuberculous benign group [(104.02 ± 62.08) μmol/lh and (0.69 ± 0.58) mmol/l, respectively] (P < 0.01). The optimal cutoff value of 101.95 μmol/lh for ascitic AFU and 1.04 mmol/l for ascitic TCH resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 82.3% and 70.8%, specificity of 63.2 and 83.8%, accuracy of 72.8 and 77.9%, PV+ of 65.3 and 78.2%, PV- of 83.1 and 77.8%, respectively. Combined detection of the two markers, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PV+ and PV- were 86.5, 85.5, 85.9, 83.0, and 88.5%, respectively. Through comparison by Pearson Chi-square, the combined detection of AFU and TCH produced better diagnostic accuracy (85.9%) compared with the individual detection (P < 0.05). The combined detection of AFU and TCH produced better diagnostic accuracy in comparison with their individual detection, which is helpful to differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites that may be relatively ideal markers to fit for clinical application in local hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21042955     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9731-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  33 in total

Review 1.  Malignant ascites.

Authors:  S L Parsons; S A Watson; R J Steele
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Malignant ascites: systematic review and guideline for treatment.

Authors:  Gerhild Becker; Daniel Galandi; Hubert E Blum
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Role of cholesterol determination in ascitic fluid analysis.

Authors:  Alexander L Gerbes; Dieter Jüngst
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Serum alpha-L-fucosidase activity and early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  M G Giardina; M Matarazzo; R Morante; A Lucariello; A Varriale; V Guardasole; G De Marco
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  G H Haydon; P C Hayes
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.566

7.  Serum alpha L-fucosidase enzyme activity in ovarian and other female genital tract tumors.

Authors:  H Abdel-Aleem; A Ahmed; A M Sabra; M Zakhari; M Soliman; H Hamed
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Characterisation of glycoforms of ascitic fluids in benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  Iwona Radziejewska; Małgorzata Borzym-Kluczyk; Dariusz G Kisiel; Zbigniew Namiot; Joanna Wosek; Andrzej Gindzieński
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.281

9.  Ascitic fluid analysis for the differentiation of malignancy-related and nonmalignant ascites. Proposal of a diagnostic sequence.

Authors:  A L Gerbes; D Jüngst; Y N Xie; W Permanetter; G Paumgartner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Management of ascites due to gastrointestinal malignancy.

Authors:  Muhammad W Saif; Imran A P Siddiqui; Muhammad A Sohail
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of ascitic cholesterol concentration for malignant ascites: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Yongchun Shen; Kai Deng; Xia Liu; Yaqin Zhao; Taiguo Liu; Ying Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Preoperative AFU Is a Useful Serological Prognostic Predictor for Colorectal Liver Oligometastasis Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection.

Authors:  Yuxiang Deng; Yujie Zhao; Wenhua Fan; Jianhong Peng; Xiao Luo; Yiwen Mo; Binyi Xiao; Lin Zhang; Zhizhong Pan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.207

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.