| Literature DB >> 21042487 |
Km Patel1, Cn Patel, B Panigrahi, As Parikh, Hn Patel.
Abstract
Three simple and sensitive visible spectrophotometric methods (A, B, and C) have been developed for the quantitative estimation of mesalamine in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Methods were based on the formation of colored chromogens, which were measured at 552 nm, 440 nm, and 494 nm, respectively. The results obtained with the proposed methods were found to be unsatisfactory with the labeled amounts when the tablet dosage forms were analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: Bratton-Marshall reagent; Gibb’s reagent; P-dimethylaminobenzaldeyde; mesalamine; visible spectroscopy
Year: 2010 PMID: 21042487 PMCID: PMC2964759 DOI: 10.4103/0975-1483.66789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Young Pharm ISSN: 0975-1483
Figure 1The reaction mechanism for method A
Figure 2The reaction mechanism for method B
Figure 3The reaction mechanism for method C
Figure 4Absorption Spectrum of Mesalamine with Bratton-Marshall reagent
Figure 5Absorption Spectrum of Mesalamine with PDAB reagent
Figure 6Absorption Spectrum of Mesalamine with Gibb’s reagent
Optical Characteristics and Precision
| Parameters | BMR | PDAB | Gibbs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xmv (nm) | 552 | 440 | 494 |
| Beer’s law limits (μg/ml) (C) | 2-30 | 50-500 | May-60 |
| Molar absoiptivity (L mol−1 cm−1) | 6.237×102 | 3.744×102 | 1.959×103 |
| Sandell’s sensitivity (μg/cm2−0.001 absorbance unit) | 0.0249 | 0.415 | 0.007 |
| Regression equation (Y*) | 0.0391 | 0.0237 | 0.0168 |
| Slope (b) | |||
| Intercept (a) | 0.0003 | 0.0041 | 0.0074 |
| Correlation coefficient(r) | 0.997 | 0.998 | 0.9988 |
| % RSD | 0.0012 | 0.00436 | 0.143 |
| Range of errors** | 0.00038 | 0.0017 | 0.0006 |
| Confidence limits with 0.05 level | |||
| Confidence limits with 0.01 level | 0.00056 | 0.0026 | 0.0009 |
| Limit of detection | 0.04 | 0.699 | 0.1712 |
| Limit of quantitation | 0.116 | 1.84 | 0.4505 |
Evaluation of Mesalamine in Pharmaceutical Preparations
| Sample (Tablet) | Labelled amount (mg) | Amount obtained | Percentage recovery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed method | Reference method | |||
| BMR | UV | BMR | ||
| Tt | 400 | 398.14±0.02 | 399.58±0.02 | 99.49±A.05 |
| PDAB | uv | PDAB | ||
| Tt | 400 | 399.92±0.02 Gibb’s | 399.58±0.02 UV | 99.46±.03 Gibb’ |
| Gibb’s | UV | Gibb’ | ||
| Tt | 400 | 399.92±0.02 | 399.58±0.02 | 99.46±0.03 |
Average of five determinations
Mean and Standard deviation of eight determinations (100 mg of Mesalamine was added and recovered)