Literature DB >> 21042203

Long-term mechanical circulatory support in 198 patients: largest single-center experience worldwide.

Thorsten Drews1, Michael Dandel, Thomas Krabatsch, Evgenij Potapov, Alexander Stepanenko, Ewald Hennig, Hans Brendan Lehmkuhl, Miralem Pasic, Yuguo Weng, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

During recent years, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have been increasingly used for long-term support. Nevertheless, problems of embolic and bleeding complication, infections, and technical failure still inhibit successful permanent support. We analyzed the courses of 198 patients who were supported for >1 year by 12 different MCS devices. Of the 198 patients, 87 had first-generation MCS devices (pulsatile), 43 second-generation devices (nonpulsatile with standard bearings), and 68 third-generation devices (nonpulsatile with magnetic bearings), implanted between July 1994 and March 2009. The mean time on support of the total group was ∼ 2 years (690 ± 321 [366-1,875] days). Of the first generation, 83 patients (95%) could be discharged; in the second and third group, all patients could be discharged. Rehospitalizations were observed in all patients. Reasons for readmission were coagulation disorders, wound infections, stroke, and technical failure. Seventy-seven patients received heart transplantation, 66 are still receiving support, 53 died, and two patients have been weaned from the device. All types of devices can be used for extended periods of time. Device- and nondevice-related rehospitalizations were observed in all three groups of patients. Close outpatient monitoring and support are crucial to ensure good long-term results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21042203     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181fe2187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Improvements in implantable mechanical circulatory support systems : literature overview and update].

Authors:  T Krabatsch; M Schweiger; A Stepanenko; T Drews; E Potapov; M Pasic; Y Weng; M Huebler; R Hetzer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Mid-term survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Fabrizio G Oliva; Tiziano Colombo; Claudio F Russo; Manlio G Cipriani; Andrea Garascia; Valentina Guida; Giulia Colombo; Alessandro Verde; Enrico Perna; Aldo Cannata; Roberto Paino; Luigi Martinelli; Maria Frigerio
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas McNamara; Harry Narroway; Michael Williams; John Brookes; James Farag; David Cistulli; Paul Bannon; Silvana Marasco; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.