BACKGROUND: Destruction of the thumb secondary to trauma presents a much more significant influence on daily living than do injuries to the other digits. Various surgical techniques contribute to repair distal defects of the fingers, especially thumb reconstruction. METHODS: Seven patients received free medial plantar artery perforator (MPAP) flaps to resurface the palmar defects of their thumbs. The flaps can be harvested with or without the main trunk of the medial plantar artery. The perforator of the MPAP flap was anastomosed to a proper digital artery, and the superficial vein of the flap was anastomosed to the dermal vein of the injured finger. These thumbs had no severe length discrepancy or metacarpophalangeal joint injuries. All patients underwent examinations including static 2-point discrimination, moving 2-point discrimination, and Semmes-Weinstein Test Score 6 months after reconstructive surgery. All tests were carried out by the same occupational therapist 6 months after reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: Five male and 2 female patients were selected for free MPAP flap reconstruction from May 2006 to September 2007. The mobility of the fingers was not restricted after surgery. Six flaps survived completely, and 1 flap partially failed because of venous congestion. Sensory restoration was ideal for all 7 MPAP flaps. CONCLUSION: The MPAP flap is a suitable choice for reconstructing palmar defects of the fingers, with less donor site morbidity. The cushiony character of the MPAP flap is anatomically similar to the pulp tissue of fingers, and sensory restoration is ideal compared with that of other reconstructive methods. Technical difficulty is focused on anastomosis of perforators (diameter ≤0.8 mm).
BACKGROUND: Destruction of the thumb secondary to trauma presents a much more significant influence on daily living than do injuries to the other digits. Various surgical techniques contribute to repair distal defects of the fingers, especially thumb reconstruction. METHODS: Seven patients received free medial plantar artery perforator (MPAP) flaps to resurface the palmar defects of their thumbs. The flaps can be harvested with or without the main trunk of the medial plantar artery. The perforator of the MPAP flap was anastomosed to a proper digital artery, and the superficial vein of the flap was anastomosed to the dermal vein of the injured finger. These thumbs had no severe length discrepancy or metacarpophalangeal joint injuries. All patients underwent examinations including static 2-point discrimination, moving 2-point discrimination, and Semmes-Weinstein Test Score 6 months after reconstructive surgery. All tests were carried out by the same occupational therapist 6 months after reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: Five male and 2 female patients were selected for free MPAP flap reconstruction from May 2006 to September 2007. The mobility of the fingers was not restricted after surgery. Six flaps survived completely, and 1 flap partially failed because of venous congestion. Sensory restoration was ideal for all 7 MPAP flaps. CONCLUSION: The MPAP flap is a suitable choice for reconstructing palmar defects of the fingers, with less donor site morbidity. The cushiony character of the MPAP flap is anatomically similar to the pulp tissue of fingers, and sensory restoration is ideal compared with that of other reconstructive methods. Technical difficulty is focused on anastomosis of perforators (diameter ≤0.8 mm).