Literature DB >> 21041972

Assessment by optical coherence tomography of stent struts across side branch. -Comparison of bare-metal stents and drug-elution stents.-.

Yong Liu1, Toshio Imanishi, Takashi Kubo, Atsushi Tanaka, Hironori Kitabata, Takashi Tanimoto, Yasushi Ino, Hideyuki Ikejima, Hiroto Tsujioka, Kenichi Komukai, Kohei Ishibashi, Manabu Kashiwagi, Yuichi Ozaki, Kumiko Hirata, Masato Mizukoshi, Takashi Akasaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Late stent thrombosis (LST) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is a major clinical problem that has not been fully explained. Incomplete neointimal coverage of stent struts is an important morphometric predictor of LST, which may be associated with impaired healing and the absence of full coverage of struts at branch-point ostia. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to compare 3 types of stents placed across side branches. METHODS AND
RESULTS: At 9-month follow-up, the neointimal coverage of the struts of 58 stents across a side branch was measured by OCT (bare metal (BMS), n = 20; sirolimus-eluting (SES), n = 23; paclitaxel-eluting (PES), n = 15). According to the diameter ratio of side branch to main vessel, the side branches were classified as either large (ratio > 0.33) or small (ratio ≤ 0.33). BMS had the lowest frequency of uncovered struts (29.4%) and the greatest neointimal thickness on the struts (123 ± 33 µm). Neointimal thickness on the struts was less for SES than for PES (72 ± 16 vs. 91 ± 22 µm, P = 0.009), but there was no difference in the frequency of uncovered struts (66.1% vs. 58.6%, P=0.493). For large side branches, the frequency of uncovered struts was greater than in the small group for SES (87.5% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.0002) and PES (83.3% vs. 18.2%; P = 0.0013); there was no significant difference for BMS (43.8% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.138).
CONCLUSIONS: Neointimal coverage on struts across a side branch was less frequently observed in DES than in BMS, particularly in large side branches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21041972     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  8 in total

1.  Novel combined miniature optical coherence tomography ultrasound probe for in vivo intravascular imaging.

Authors:  Jiechen Yin; Xiang Li; Joe Jing; Jiawen Li; David Mukai; Sari Mahon; Ahmad Edris; Khiet Hoang; K Kirk Shung; Matthew Brenner; Jagat Narula; Qifa Zhou; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Neointimal response to everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted at bifurcating coronary segments: insights from optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Takao Sato; John Jose; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Dmitriy S Sulimov; Ralph Tölg; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  A review in enormity of OCT and its enduring understanding of vulnerable plaque in coronary bifurcation lesion.

Authors:  Rajiv Shrestha; Aanchal Shrestha; Jing Kan; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Intravascular atherosclerotic imaging with combined fluorescence and optical coherence tomography probe based on a double-clad fiber combiner.

Authors:  Shanshan Liang; Arya Saidi; Joe Jing; Gangjun Liu; Jiawen Li; Jun Zhang; Changsen Sun; Jagat Narula; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Serial changes in the three-dimensional aspect of the side-branch ostium jailed by a drug-eluting stent assessed by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Takeshi Nakamura; Takayuki Okamura; Tatsuhiro Fujimura; Jutaro Yamada; Tomoko Nao; Hiroki Tateishi; Takao Maeda; Takamasa Oda; Kozo Shiraishi; Tadamitsu Nakashima; Shigehiko Nishimura; Toshiro Miura; Masunori Matsuzaki; Masafumi Yano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Optical coherence tomography: from research to practice.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Eduardo Alegría-Barrero; Rodrigo Teijeiro-Mestre; Pak Hei Chan; Hiroto Tsujioka; Ranil de Silva; Nicola Viceconte; Alistair Lindsay; Tiffany Patterson; Nicolas Foin; Takashi Akasaka; Carlo di Mario
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  The basics of intravascular optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tomasz Roleder; Jacek Jąkała; Grzegorz L Kałuża; Łukasz Partyka; Klaudia Proniewska; Elżbieta Pociask; Wojciech Zasada; Wojciech Wojakowski; Zbigniew Gąsior; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 1.426

Review 8.  Current Advances in the Diagnostic Imaging of Atherosclerosis: Insights into the Pathophysiology of Vulnerable Plaque.

Authors:  Nataliya V Mushenkova; Volha I Summerhill; Dongwei Zhang; Elena B Romanenko; Andrey V Grechko; Alexander N Orekhov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.