BACKGROUND:Durable efficacy and long-term safety of antiretroviral therapy are important goals in the management of treatment-experienced patients. The 96-week efficacy and safety of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine were evaluated in the Phase III DUET trials. METHODS:HIV type-1-infected treatment-experienced adults with viral loads >5,000 copies/ml and NNRTI and protease inhibitor resistance were randomized to receive etravirine 200 mg or placebo, each twice daily and in combination with a background regimen of darunavir/ritonavir twice daily, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and optional enfuvirtide. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat analysis, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm) at week 24. Results from both trials were combined in the pre-specified pooled 96-week analysis. RESULTS: In total, 599 patients receivedetravirine and 604 received placebo. At week 96, 57% of patients in the etravirine group versus 36% in the placebo group had a viral load <50 copies/ml (P<0.0001); 91% and 88% of patients, respectively, had maintained this response from week 48. Mean increases in CD4(+) T-cell count from baseline at week 96 were 128 cells/mm(3) with etravirine versus 86 cells/mm(3) with placebo (P<0.0001). With the exception of rash, which was reported more frequently with etravirine than placebo (21% versus 12%, respectively; P<0.0001), the safety and tolerability profile of etravirine was similar to placebo over the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS:Etravirine, in combination with an antiretroviral background regimen, provided durable virological and immunological responses with no new safety concerns in treatment-experienced patients over 96 weeks in the DUET trials.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Durable efficacy and long-term safety of antiretroviral therapy are important goals in the management of treatment-experienced patients. The 96-week efficacy and safety of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine were evaluated in the Phase III DUET trials. METHODS:HIV type-1-infected treatment-experienced adults with viral loads >5,000 copies/ml and NNRTI and protease inhibitor resistance were randomized to receive etravirine 200 mg or placebo, each twice daily and in combination with a background regimen of darunavir/ritonavir twice daily, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and optional enfuvirtide. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml (intent-to-treat analysis, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm) at week 24. Results from both trials were combined in the pre-specified pooled 96-week analysis. RESULTS: In total, 599 patients received etravirine and 604 received placebo. At week 96, 57% of patients in the etravirine group versus 36% in the placebo group had a viral load <50 copies/ml (P<0.0001); 91% and 88% of patients, respectively, had maintained this response from week 48. Mean increases in CD4(+) T-cell count from baseline at week 96 were 128 cells/mm(3) with etravirine versus 86 cells/mm(3) with placebo (P<0.0001). With the exception of rash, which was reported more frequently with etravirine than placebo (21% versus 12%, respectively; P<0.0001), the safety and tolerability profile of etravirine was similar to placebo over the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS:Etravirine, in combination with an antiretroviral background regimen, provided durable virological and immunological responses with no new safety concerns in treatment-experienced patients over 96 weeks in the DUET trials.
Authors: Eugene L Asahchop; Mark A Wainberg; Richard D Sloan; Cécile L Tremblay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sarah B Lorenzana; Michael D Hughes; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Ann C Collier; Paula Mendes Luz; Kenneth A Freedberg; Robin Wood; Julie H Levison; Peter N Mugyenyi; Robert Salata; Carole L Wallis; Milton C Weinstein; Robert T Schooley; Rochelle P Walensky Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Hong-Tao Xu; Susan P Colby-Germinario; Eugene L Asahchop; Maureen Oliveira; Matthew McCallum; Susan M Schader; Yingshan Han; Yudong Quan; Stefan G Sarafianos; Mark A Wainberg Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Anh Nguyen; Steven Rossi; David Croteau; Brookie M Best; David Clifford; Ann C Collier; Benjamin Gelman; Christina Marra; Justin McArthur; J Allen McCutchan; Susan Morgello; David Simpson; Ronald J Ellis; Igor Grant; Edmund Capparelli; Scott Letendre Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-01-20 Impact factor: 5.790