Literature DB >> 21041129

Sub-sample displacement estimation from digitized ultrasound RF signals using multi-dimensional polynomial fitting of the cross-correlation function.

Reza Zahiri Azar1, Orcun Goksel, Septimiu E Salcudean.   

Abstract

A widely used time-domain technique for motion or delay estimation between digitized ultrasound RF signals involves the maximization of a discrete pattern-matching function, usually the cross-correlation. To achieve sub-sample accuracy, the discrete pattern-matching function is interpolated using the values at the discrete maximizer and adjacent samples. In prior work, only 1-D fit, applied separately along the axial, lateral, and elevational axes, has been used to estimate the sub-sample motion in 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D. In this paper, we explore the use of 2-D and 3-D polynomial fitting for this purpose. We quantify the estimation error in noise-free simulations using Field II and experiments with a commercial ultrasound machine. In simulated 2-D translational motions, function fitting with quartic spline polynomials leads to maximum bias of 0.2% of the sample spacing in the axial direction and 0.4% of the sample spacing in the lateral direction, corresponding to 38 nm and 1.31 μm, respectively. The maximum standard deviations were approximately 1% of the sample spacing in both the axial and the lateral directions, corresponding to 193 nm axially and 4.43 μm laterally. In simulated 1% axial strain, the same function fitting leads to mean absolute displacement estimation errors of 255 nm in the axial direction and 4.77 μm in the lateral direction. In experiments with a linear array transducer, 2-D quartic spline fitting leads to maximum bias of 458 nm and 6.27 μm in the axial and the lateral directions, respectively. These results are more than one order of magnitude smaller than those obtained with separate 1-D fit when applied to the same data set. Simulations and experiments in 3-D yield similar results when comparing 3-D polynomial fitting with 1-D fitting along the axial, lateral, and elevational directions.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21041129     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  7 in total

1.  Normal and shear strain imaging using 2D deformation tracking on beam steered linear array datasets.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of Displacement Tracking Algorithms for in Vivo Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Authors:  Robert M Pohlman; Tomy Varghese; Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Marci L Alexander; Kelly L Wergin; James L Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  The use of 2D ultrasound elastography for measuring tendon motion and strain.

Authors:  Laura Chernak Slane; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Tendon motion and strain patterns evaluated with two-dimensional ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Laura A Chernak; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A GPU-Accelerated 3-D Coupled Subsample Estimation Algorithm for Volumetric Breast Strain Elastography.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Yuqi Wang; Timothy J Hall; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Biplanar ultrasound investigation of in vivo Achilles tendon displacement non-uniformity.

Authors:  Lauri Stenroth; Darryl Thelen; Jason Franz
Journal:  Transl Sports Med       Date:  2018-12-01

7.  A coupled subsample displacement estimation method for ultrasound-based strain elastography.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.