Literature DB >> 21039961

Temporal dynamics of sinusoidal and non-sinusoidal amplitude modulation.

Garreth Prendergast1, Sam R Johnson, Gary G R Green.   

Abstract

Previous behavioural studies in human subjects have demonstrated the importance of amplitude modulations to the process of intelligible speech perception. In functional neuroimaging studies of amplitude modulation processing, the inherent assumption is that all sounds are decomposed into simple building blocks, i.e. sinusoidal modulations. The encoding of complex and dynamic stimuli is often modelled to be the linear addition of a number of sinusoidal modulations and so, by investigating the response of the cortex to sinusoidal modulation, an experimenter can probe the same mechanisms used to encode speech. The experiment described in this paper used magnetoencephalography to measure the auditory steady-state response produced by six sounds, all modulated in amplitude at the same frequency but which formed a continuum from sinusoidal to pulsatile modulation. Analysis of the evoked response shows that the magnitude of the envelope-following response is highly non-linear, with sinusoidal amplitude modulation producing the weakest steady-state response. Conversely, the phase of the steady-state response was related to the shape of the modulation waveform, with the sinusoidal amplitude modulation producing the shortest latency relative to the other stimuli. It is shown that a point in auditory cortex produces a strong envelope following response to all stimuli on the continuum, but the timing of this response is related to the shape of the modulation waveform. The results suggest that steady-state response characteristics are determined by features of the waveform outside of the modulation domain and that the use of purely sinusoidal amplitude modulations may be misleading, especially in the context of speech encoding.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039961     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  6 in total

1.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Examining the effects of one- and three-dimensional spatial filtering analyses in magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Sam Johnson; Garreth Prendergast; Mark Hymers; Gary Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Stimulus variability affects the amplitude of the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Michael I G Simpson; William P Woods; Garreth Prendergast; Sam R Johnson; Gary G R Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Cortical entrainment to continuous speech: functional roles and interpretations.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Simple Acoustic Features Can Explain Phoneme-Based Predictions of Cortical Responses to Speech.

Authors:  Christoph Daube; Robin A A Ince; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Low-Frequency Spike-Field Coherence Is a Fingerprint of Periodicity Coding in the Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Francisco García-Rosales; Lisa M Martin; M Jerome Beetz; Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarria
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-10-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.