Literature DB >> 21039954

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of vegetative state.

Takamitsu Yamamoto1, Yoichi Katayama, Kazutaka Kobayashi, Hideki Oshima, Chikashi Fukaya, Takashi Tsubokawa.   

Abstract

One hundred and seven patients in vegetative state (VS) were evaluated neurologically and electrophysiologically over 3 months (90 days) after the onset of brain injury. Among these patients, 21 were treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The stimulation sites were the mesencephalic reticular formation (two patients) and centromedian-parafascicularis nucleus complex (19 cases). Eight of the patients recovered from VS and were able to obey verbal commands at 13 and 10 months in the case of head trauma and at 19, 14, 13, 12, 12 and 8 months in the case of vascular disease after comatose brain injury, and no patients without DBS recovered from VS spontaneously within 24 months after brain injury. The eight patients who recovered from VS showed desynchronization on continuous EEG frequency analysis. The Vth wave of the auditory brainstem response and N20 of the somatosensory evoked potential could be recorded, although with a prolonged latency, and the pain-related P250 was recorded with an amplitude of > 7 μV. Sixteen (14.9%) of the 107 VS patients satisfied these criteria in our electrophysiological evaluation, 10 of whom were treated with DBS and six of whom were not treated with DBS. In these 16 patients, the recovery rate from VS was different between the DBS therapy group and the no DBS therapy group (P < 0.01, Fisher's exact probability test) These findings indicate that DBS may be useful for the recovery of patients from VS if the candidates are selected on the basis of electrophysiological criteria.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039954     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07412.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  22 in total

1.  Centromedian-parafascicular deep brain stimulation induces differential functional inhibition of the motor, associative, and limbic circuits in large animals.

Authors:  Joo Pyung Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Emily J Knight; Penelope S Duffy; Osama A Abulseoud; Michael P Marsh; Katherine Kelsey; Charles D Blaha; Kevin E Bennet; Mark A Frye; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Deep brain stimulation: current and future clinical applications.

Authors:  Mark K Lyons
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Chronic deep cerebellar stimulation promotes long-term potentiation, microstructural plasticity, and reorganization of perilesional cortical representation in a rodent model.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Havan Furmaga; Ela Plow; Hyun-Joo Park; Zhihong Chen; Grahame Kidd; Kenneth B Baker; John T Gale; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Current Status of Neuromodulatory Therapies for Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Xia; Yi Yang; Yongkun Guo; Yang Bai; Yuanyuan Dang; Ruxiang Xu; Jianghong He
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 5.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  X L Chen; Y Y Xiong; G L Xu; X F Liu
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-09

Review 6.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of disorders of consciousness and cognition in traumatic brain injury patients: a review.

Authors:  Bornali Kundu; Andrea A Brock; Dario J Englot; Christopher R Butson; John D Rolston
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Optimized depiction of thalamic substructures with a combination of T1-MPRAGE and phase: MPRAGE.

Authors:  Benjamin Bender; Stefan Wagner; Uwe Klose
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 8.  Challenges and demand for modeling disorders of consciousness following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John C O'Donnell; Kevin D Browne; Todd J Kilbaugh; H Isaac Chen; John Whyte; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Drivers of the primate thalamus.

Authors:  Zita Rovó; István Ulbert; László Acsády
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions.

Authors:  Brian L Edlow; Leandro R D Sanz; Robert D Stevens; Olivia Gosseries; Len Polizzotto; Nader Pouratian; John D Rolston; Samuel B Snider; Aurore Thibaut
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.