Literature DB >> 21039644

High mid-term mortality following successful lead extraction for infection.

Charles A Henrikson1, Karl Zhang, Jeffrey A Brinker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction patients tend to have multiple medical problems complicated by prolonged infections that may result in high-mortality rates following a successful procedure.
METHODS: All adult patients referred for lead extraction for infection over a 4-year period were included in this study. Mortality following the procedure was assessed using hospital records and the Social Security Death Index.
RESULTS: Indications for extraction were systemic infection (n = 34) and isolated pocket infection (n = 33). Of the 67 patients, 47 (70%) were still alive at follow-up (6-55 months). No patient died during or within 24 hours of the procedure, and two were sent to emergent surgery and did well. However, five died during prolonged hospitalizations, and two were discharged to hospice care and died shortly thereafter. The remaining 13 deaths occurred after discharge from the hospital at a mean interval of 15 months (range, 24 days to 35 months) following the procedure. Notably, six of seven patients who died in the hospital, and nine of 13 who died after discharge, had bacteremia as their indication for extraction, for an overall mortality risk of 44% in patients with systemic infection.
CONCLUSIONS: True risk assessment for lead extraction patients is underestimated and may be related to the focus on the procedural risks, while the underlying illness and physiologic state may account for the excess mortality following a successful extraction. In most cases, the infected hardware contributed to the length and severity of the illness, and thus earlier consideration for extraction may be warranted. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039644     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Snare sheath versus evolution sheath in transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Jihua Kong; Yilun Tian; Fei Guo; Feng Ze; Jiangbo Duan; Long Wang; Xuebin Li; Jihong Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

2.  Extraction of chronically implanted cardiovascular electronic device leads.

Authors:  Jeffrey Brinker
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-08

3.  One-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transvenous Extraction of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads.

Authors:  Maciej Kempa; Szymon Budrejko; Marta Piepiorka-Broniecka; Jan Rogowski; Dariusz Kozlowski; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prognosis after lead extraction in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices infection: Comparison of lead-related infective endocarditis with pocket infection in a Japanese single-center experience.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Nishii; Yoshimasa Morimoto; Akihito Miyoshi; Saori Tsukuda; Masakazu Miyamoto; Satoshi Kawada; Koji Nakagawa; Atsuyuki Watanabe; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Morimatsu; Nobuchika Kusano; Shingo Kasahara; Morio Shoda; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Implantable defibrillator lead extraction with optimized standard extraction techniques.

Authors:  Xian-Ming Chu; Xue-Bin Li; Ping Zhang; Yi An; Jiang-Bo Duan; Long Wang; Ding Li; Bing Li; Ji-Hong Guo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.