BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular status is a crucial determinant in the pre-operative assessment of patients for surgery as well as for the handling of patients with acute illness. We hypothesized that focus-assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE) could be performed with the subject in the semi-recumbent position. The aim was also to test whether the image quality of Vscan is interchangeable with a conventional high-quality portable echocardiography system. Furthermore, we evaluated the time needed to achieve an interpretable four-chamber view and to complete a full FATE examination. METHODS:Sixty-one subjects were included. All subjects were examined in accordance with the FATE protocol in the semi-recumbent position on two different systems: the novel Vscan pocket device and the high-quality portable Vivid i system. Two evaluations were performed. In group A (n=30), the focus was on image quality. In group B (n=31), the focus was on the time consumed. RESULTS: Group A: All patients (100%) had at least one image suitable for interpretation and no significant difference in image quality (P=0.32) was found between the two different systems. Group B: The mean value for the total time consumed for a full FATE was 69.3 s (59.8-78.8) on the Vscan and 63.7s (56.7-70.8) on the Vivid i, with no significant difference among the scanners (P=0.08). CONCLUSION: The Vscan displays image quality interchangeable with larger and more expensive systems. The apparatus is well suited for performing a FATE examination in a 1-day surgery setting and could very well also be applicable in almost any situation involving patients with acute illness.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular status is a crucial determinant in the pre-operative assessment of patients for surgery as well as for the handling of patients with acute illness. We hypothesized that focus-assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE) could be performed with the subject in the semi-recumbent position. The aim was also to test whether the image quality of Vscan is interchangeable with a conventional high-quality portable echocardiography system. Furthermore, we evaluated the time needed to achieve an interpretable four-chamber view and to complete a full FATE examination. METHODS: Sixty-one subjects were included. All subjects were examined in accordance with the FATE protocol in the semi-recumbent position on two different systems: the novel Vscan pocket device and the high-quality portable Vivid i system. Two evaluations were performed. In group A (n=30), the focus was on image quality. In group B (n=31), the focus was on the time consumed. RESULTS: Group A: All patients (100%) had at least one image suitable for interpretation and no significant difference in image quality (P=0.32) was found between the two different systems. Group B: The mean value for the total time consumed for a full FATE was 69.3 s (59.8-78.8) on the Vscan and 63.7s (56.7-70.8) on the Vivid i, with no significant difference among the scanners (P=0.08). CONCLUSION: The Vscan displays image quality interchangeable with larger and more expensive systems. The apparatus is well suited for performing a FATE examination in a 1-day surgery setting and could very well also be applicable in almost any situation involving patients with acute illness.
Authors: Michael W Cullen; Lori A Blauwet; Ori M Vatury; Sharon L Mulvagh; Thomas R Behrenbeck; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Benjamin Acheampong; David A Parra; Muktar H Aliyu; Troy D Moon; Jonathan H Soslow Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Jason C Ojeda; James A Colbert; Xinyi Lin; Graham T McMahon; Peter M Doubilet; Carol B Benson; Justina Wu; Joel T Katz; Maria A Yialamas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hashim A Khan; Nathan E Wineinger; Poulina Q Uddin; Hirsch S Mehta; David S Rubenson; Eric J Topol Journal: Am J Med Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Jean-Bernard Amiel; Ana Grümann; Gwenaëlle Lhéritier; Marc Clavel; Bruno François; Nicolas Pichon; Anthony Dugard; Benoît Marin; Philippe Vignon Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Matthieu Biais; Cédric Carrié; François Delaunay; Nicolas Morel; Philippe Revel; Gérard Janvier Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 9.097