Literature DB >> 21039153

Vertebroplasty-augmented short-segment posterior fixation of osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit in the thoracolumbar spine: comparisons with posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgery.

Kenzo Uchida1, Hideaki Nakajima, Takafumi Yayama, Tsuyoshi Miyazaki, Takayuki Hirai, Shigeru Kobayashi, Kebing Chen, Alexander Rodriguez Guerrero, Hisatoshi Baba.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The surgical approach and treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit have not been documented in detail. Anterior surgery provides good decompression and solid fusion, but the surgery-related risk is relatively higher than that associated with the posterior approach. In posterior surgery, the major problem after posterior correction and instrumentation is failure to support the anterior spinal column, leading to loss of correction of kyphosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reinforcing short-segment posterior fixation with vertebroplasty and to compare the outcome with those of posterior surgery without vertebroplasty and anterior surgery, retrospectively.
METHODS: The authors studied 83 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a single thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficit. Twenty-eight patients treated by posterior surgery combined with vertebroplasty (Group A), 25 patients treated by posterior surgery without vertebroplasty (Group B), and 30 patients treated by anterior surgery (Group C) were followed up for a mean postoperative period of 4.4 years. Neurological outcome, visual analog scale pain score, and radiographic results were compared in the 3 groups.
RESULTS: Postoperative (4-6 weeks) and follow-up neurological outcome and visual analog scale scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Postoperative kyphotic angle was significantly reduced in Group B compared with Group C (p = 0.007), whereas the kyphotic angle was not significantly different among the 3 groups at follow-up. The mean ± SD loss of correction at follow-up was 4.6° ± 4.5°, 8.6° ± 6.2°, and 4.5° ± 5.9° in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. The correction loss at follow-up in Group B was significantly higher compared with Groups A and C (p = 0.0171 and p = 0.0180, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that additional reinforcement with vertebroplasty reduces the kyphotic loss and instrumentation failure, compared with patients without the reinforcement of vertebroplasty. Vertebroplasty-augmented short-segment fixation seems to offer immediate spinal stability in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral collapse; the effect seems equivalent to that of anterior reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039153     DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  41 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: indications and techniques of a 360°-stabilization.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; J-S Jarvers; C-E Heyde; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  [Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Diagnostics and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt; U Spiegl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Surgical treatment for osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits: retrospective comparative study of three procedures--anterior surgery versus posterior spinal shorting osteotomy versus posterior spinal fusion using vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Masafumi Kashii; Ryoji Yamazaki; Tomoya Yamashita; Shinya Okuda; Takahito Fujimori; Yukitaka Nagamoto; Yuichi Tamura; Takenori Oda; Tetsuo Ohwada; Hideki Yoshikawa; Motoki Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with intravertebral cleft associated with delayed neurologic deficit.

Authors:  Toshio Nakamae; Yoshinori Fujimoto; Kiyotaka Yamada; Haruhiko Takata; Takuro Shimbo; Yasuyuki Tsuchida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  U J Spiegl; C Josten; B M Devitt; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures: clinical and radiological outcome after a mean of 4 years.

Authors:  Ulrich J Spiegl; Christine Anemüller; Jan-Sven Jarvers; Nicolaus von der Höh; Christoph Josten; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical treatment for osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral collapse using vertebroplasty with posterior spinal fusion: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Keiichi Katsumi; Toru Hirano; Kei Watanabe; Masayuki Ohashi; Akiyoshi Yamazaki; Takui Ito; Kimihiko Sawakami; Atsuki Sano; Ren Kikuchi; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Factors affecting postoperative activities of daily living in patients with osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits.

Authors:  Masafumi Kashii; Ryoji Yamazaki; Tomoya Yamashita; Shinya Okuda; Takahito Fujimori; Yukitaka Nagamoto; Yuichi Tamura; Takenori Oda; Tetsuo Ohwada; Motoki Iwasaki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Review: indications for interventional radiology in the management of patients with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Roberta Dionello; Luis Lopez de Heredia; Richard J Hughes; Tom M Meagher; Maurizio Belci; Dinuke R Warakaulle
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2013

10.  Percutaneous cement augmentation techniques for osteoporotic spinal fractures.

Authors:  L M Benneker; S Hoppe
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.