Literature DB >> 21038957

Angry facial expressions hamper subsequent target identification.

Peter J de Jong1, Ernst H W Koster, Rineke van Wees, Sander Martens.   

Abstract

There is considerable evidence indicating that people are primed to monitor social signals of disapproval. Thus far, studies on selective attention have concentrated predominantly on the spatial domain, whereas the temporal consequences of identifying socially threatening information have received only scant attention. Therefore, this study focused on temporal attention costs and examined how the presentation of emotional expressions affects subsequent identification of task-relevant information. High (n = 30) and low (n = 31) socially anxious women were exposed to a dual-target rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Emotional faces (neutral, happy, angry) were presented as the first target (T1) and neutral letter stimuli (p, q, d, b) as the second target (T2). Irrespective of social anxiety, the attentional blink was relatively large when angry faces were presented as T1. This apparent prioritized processing of angry faces is consistent with evolutionary models, stressing the importance of being especially attentive to potential signals of social threat. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21038957     DOI: 10.1037/a0019353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  11 in total

1.  Sparing and impairing: Emotion modulation of the attentional blink and the spread of sparing in a 3-target RSVP task.

Authors:  Manuel Petrucci; Anna Pecchinenda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Morality extracted under crowding impairs face identification.

Authors:  Risako Shirai; Hirokazu Ogawa
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-06-24

3.  Induced negative arousal modulates the speed of visual working memory consolidation.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Jc Lynne Lu Sing; Ana Martinez-Flores; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2022-01-06

4.  Fearful, but not angry, expressions diffuse attention to peripheral targets in an attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  James M Taylor; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-04-07

5.  Emotional modulation of the attentional blink is awareness-dependent.

Authors:  Wenli Qian; Qianli Meng; Lin Chen; Ke Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interactive effects between gaze direction and facial expression on attentional resources deployment: the task instruction and context matter.

Authors:  Paola Ricciardelli; Luisa Lugli; Antonello Pellicano; Cristina Iani; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Retro-Active Emotion: Do Negative Emotional Stimuli Disrupt Consolidation in Working Memory?

Authors:  Güven Kandemir; Elkan G Akyürek; Mark R Nieuwenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prefrontal control of attention to threat.

Authors:  Polly V Peers; Jon S Simons; Andrew D Lawrence
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Emotional modulation of the attentional blink and the relation to interpersonal reactivity.

Authors:  Philipp Kanske; Sandra Schönfelder; Michèle Wessa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Facial expression influences face identity recognition during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Martin Schmidt-Daffy; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.