Literature DB >> 21038949

Anxiety enhances threat processing without competition among multiple inputs: a diffusion model analysis.

Corey N White1, Roger Ratcliff, Michael W Vasey, Gail McKoon.   

Abstract

Enhanced processing of threatening information is a well established phenomenon among high-anxious individuals. This effect is most reliably shown in situations where 2 or more items compete for processing resources, suggesting that input competition is a critical component of the effect. However, it could be that there are small effects in situations without input competition, but the dependent measures typically used are not sensitive enough to detect them. The present study analyzed data from a noncompetition task, single-string lexical decision, with the diffusion model, a decision process model that provides a more direct measure of performance differences than either response times or accuracy alone. The diffusion model analysis showed a consistent processing advantage for threatening words in high-anxious individuals, whereas traditional comparisons showed no significant differences. These results challenge the view that input competition is necessary for enhanced threat processing. Implications for theories of anxiety are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21038949     DOI: 10.1037/a0019474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  39 in total

1.  Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Eliza Congdon; Russell A Poldrack; Fred W Sabb; Edythe D London; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-05-15

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of the drift diffusion model in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Christina J Mueller; Corey N White; Lars Kuchinke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Aging and Predicting Inferences: A Diffusion Model Analysis.

Authors:  Gail McKoon; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-04-23

Review 7.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Model-based assessment and neural correlates of spatial memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Alexander S Weigard; K Sathian; Benjamin M Hampstead
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  A model-based quantification of action control deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Servant; Nelleke van Wouwe; Scott A Wylie; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.