OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. METHODS: A total of 60 hospitalized patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to receive omeprazole group 40 mg/d (20 patients), pantoprazole group 40 mg/d (20 patients) and control group (20 patients). All patients also received standard clopidogrel therapy, continuing 30 days treatments. The percentage clotting inhibition was measured by the use of thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate (MPAR) was measured by turbidity method at the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and hemorrhagic events within 30 days were recorded. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics, angiography and PCI result were compared among the three groups. At the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment, no significant difference was shown in the percentage clotting inhibition measured by thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate (MPAR) measured by turbidity method among the three groups. Though the platelet agglutination inhibition rate measured at 15 and 30 days increased and MPAR measured at 15 and 30 days declined compared with the baseline data (P < 0.05), no significant difference was found between levels measured at 15 and 30 days (P > 0.05). The rates of MACCE had no significant difference among the three groups. Compared with control group, the rates of hemorrhagic event were significantly decreased in omeprazole or pantoprazole group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was shown between the omeprazole and pantoprazole group. CONCLUSION: No significant impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel has been found in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation and short-time combined administration is safe.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. METHODS: A total of 60 hospitalized patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to receive omeprazole group 40 mg/d (20 patients), pantoprazole group 40 mg/d (20 patients) and control group (20 patients). All patients also received standard clopidogrel therapy, continuing 30 days treatments. The percentage clotting inhibition was measured by the use of thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate (MPAR) was measured by turbidity method at the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and hemorrhagic events within 30 days were recorded. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics, angiography and PCI result were compared among the three groups. At the first day before admission and 15 or 30 days after treatment, no significant difference was shown in the percentage clotting inhibition measured by thrombelastogram and the maximal platelet aggregation rate (MPAR) measured by turbidity method among the three groups. Though the platelet agglutination inhibition rate measured at 15 and 30 days increased and MPAR measured at 15 and 30 days declined compared with the baseline data (P < 0.05), no significant difference was found between levels measured at 15 and 30 days (P > 0.05). The rates of MACCE had no significant difference among the three groups. Compared with control group, the rates of hemorrhagic event were significantly decreased in omeprazole or pantoprazole group (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was shown between the omeprazole and pantoprazole group. CONCLUSION: No significant impact of different proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel has been found in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation and short-time combined administration is safe.
Authors: Alexandra Demcsák; Tamás Lantos; Emese Réka Bálint; Petra Hartmann; Áron Vincze; Judit Bajor; László Czopf; Hussain Alizadeh; Zoltán Gyöngyi; Katalin Márta; Alexandra Mikó; Zsolt Szakács; Dániel Pécsi; Péter Hegyi; Imre László Szabó Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.566