Literature DB >> 21038032

Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks.

R Zernecke1, B Vollmer, J Albrecht, A M Kleemann, K Haegler, J Linn, G Fesl, H Bruckmann, M Wiesmann.   

Abstract

The olfactory test battery Sniffin’ Sticks is a test of nasal chemosensory function that is based on pen-like devices for odour presentation. It consists of three olfactory subtests: threshold, discrimination, and identification. The detection threshold can be measured using two different odorants--n-butanol or PEA (phenylethyl alcohol). Both tasks are commonly applied in published studies, but little is known about the formal comparison of values obtained using them. Unlike the Sniffin’ Sticks with n-butanol as odorant, there is poor validation for the threshold subtest with the odorant PEA. The purpose of this study was to compare these two different odorants. Both odorants were applied to 100 normosmic, healthy subjects (50 females). The experiment was divided into two sessions performed on two different days. After each threshold test the discrimination and identification subtests were conducted. We obtained significant differences in detection thresholds of PEA and n-butanol. The mean score of PEA threshold and PEA TDI (sum of threshold, discrimination, identification) was significantly higher compared to n-butanol. No significant correlation between individual PEA and n-butanol thresholds was observed. The differences between both odorants indicate that a formal validation of the Sniffin’ Sticks with PEA as odorant for probing olfactory thresholds may be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21038032     DOI: 10.4193/Rhino09.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on olfaction in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Christina Schwenck; Regina Taurines; Christine Freitag; Andreas Warnke; Manfred Gerlach; Marcel Romanos
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; J Albrecht; B Bryant; J N Lundström
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; David Rosen; Brian Lyman; Karen K Yee; Nancy E Rawson; Beverly J Cowart
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.858

4.  Assessment of olfactory detection thresholds in children with autism spectrum disorders using a pulse ejection system.

Authors:  Hirokazu Kumazaki; Taro Muramatsu; Takashi X Fujisawa; Masutomo Miyao; Eri Matsuura; Ken-Ichi Okada; Hirotaka Kosaka; Akemi Tomoda; Masaru Mimura
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 7.509

5.  Chemical complexity of odors increases reliability of olfactory threshold testing.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Robert Pellegrino; Katharina Pusch; Celine Margot; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Heightened Olfactory Sensitivity in Young Females with Recent-Onset Anorexia Nervosa and Recovered Individuals.

Authors:  Mette Bentz; Johanne Guldberg; Signe Vangkilde; Tine Pedersen; Kerstin Jessica Plessen; Jens Richardt Moellegaard Jepsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.