Literature DB >> 21035796

Valuation of environmental quality and eco-cultural attributes in Northwestern Idaho: Native Americans are more concerned than Caucasians.

Joanna Burger1.   

Abstract

Valuation of features of habitats and ecosystems usually encompasses the goods and services that ecosystems provide, but rarely also examine how people value ecological resources in terms of eco-cultural and sacred activities. The social, sacred, and cultural aspects of ecosystems are particularly important to Native Americans, but western science has rarely examined the importance of eco-cultural attributes quantitatively. In this paper I explore differences in ecosystem evaluations, and compare the perceptions and evaluations of places people go for consumptive and non-consumptive resource use with evaluations of the same qualities for religious and sacred places. Qualities of ecosystems included goods (abundant fish and crabs, butterflies and flowers, clean water), services (complexity of nature, lack of radionuclides that present a health risk), and eco-cultural attributes (appears unspoiled, scenic horizons, noise-free). Native Americans and Caucasians were interviewed at a Pow Wow at Post Falls, Idaho, which is in the region with the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, known for its storage of radioactive wastes and contamination. A higher percentage of Native American subjects engaged in consumptive and religious activities than did Caucasians. Native Americans engaged in higher rates of many activities than did Caucasians, including commune with nature, pray or meditate, fish or hunt, collect herbs, and conduct vision quests or other ceremonies. For nearly all attributes, there was no difference in the relative ratings given by Native Americans for characteristics of sites used for consumption/non-consumptive activities compared to religious/sacred places. However, Caucasians rated nearly all attributes lower for religious/sacred places than they did for places where they engaged in consumptive or non-consumptive activities. Native Americans were less concerned with distance from home for consumptive/non-consumptive activities, compared to religious activities. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21035796      PMCID: PMC4425303          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  10 in total

1.  The ethics of research in American Indian communities.

Authors:  Murray L Wax
Journal:  Am Indian Q       Date:  1991

2.  Commodification of the sacred through intellectual property rights.

Authors:  Darrell A Posey
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.360

3.  Protecting Native Americans through the risk assessment process: A commentary on "an examination of U.S. EPA risk assessment principles and practices".

Authors:  Pamela Bridgen
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  The economic perspective: conservation against development versus conservation for development.

Authors:  Carl Folke
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  A possible approach for setting a mercury risk-based action level based on tribal fish ingestion rates.

Authors:  Barbara L Harper; Stuart G Harris
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Issues in evaluating fish consumption rates for Native American tribes.

Authors:  Jamie Donatuto; Barbara L Harper
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  A Native American exposure scenario.

Authors:  S G Harris; B L Harper
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Gender differences in resource use and evaluation of attributes of places of resource use by Native Americans and Caucasians from Western Idaho: relevance to risk evaluations.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2010

9.  Measuring the health status gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives: getting closer to the truth.

Authors:  Emily Puukka; Paul Stehr-Green; Thomas M Becker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Ecocultural attributes: evaluating ecological degradation in terms of ecological goods and services versus subsistence and tribal values.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Karen Pletnikoff; Ronald Snigaroff; Daniel Snigaroff; Tim Stamm
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.000

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Ecological concerns following Superstorm Sandy: stressor level and recreational activity levels affect perceptions of ecosystem.

Authors:  Joanna Burger
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Perceptions of severe storms, climate change, ecological structures and resiliency three years post-hurricane Sandy in New Jersey.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Perceptions of Climate Change, Sea Level Rise, and Possible Consequences Relate Mainly to Self-Valuation of Science Knowledge.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; Taryn Pittfield; Christian Jeitner
Journal:  Energy Power Eng       Date:  2016-05-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.