BACKGROUND: The symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be explained, at least in part, as an inability to inhibit learned fear during conditions of safety. Our group has shown that fear inhibition is impaired in both combat and civilian PTSD populations. On the basis of our earlier findings, we employed an established fear extinction paradigm to further explore fear dysregulation in a civilian traumatized population. METHODS: Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) was examined in 127 trauma-exposed individuals with and without PTSD. We used a protocol in which conditioned fear was first acquired through the presentation of one colored shape (reinforced conditioned stimulus, [CS+]) that was paired with an aversive air blast to the larynx (unconditioned stimulus) and a different colored shape that was not paired to the air blast (nonreinforced condition stimulus). Fear was extinguished 10 min later through repeated presentations of the CSs without reinforcement. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated successful fear conditioning on the basis of startle and unconditioned stimulus-expectancy ratings; however, participants with PTSD displayed greater FPS responses to the CS+ and nonreinforced conditioned stimulus compared with the group without PTSD. During fear extinction, the PTSD group showed elevated FPS responses to the previously reinforced CS+ during the early and middle stages of extinction. During the acquisition and extinction phases, PTSD participants with higher levels of reexperiencing symptoms exhibited greater potentiated startle responses to the CS+ compared with PTSD participants with lower reexperiencing symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PTSD is associated with enhanced fear learning and a greater "fear load" to extinguish after conditioned fear is acquired.
BACKGROUND: The symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be explained, at least in part, as an inability to inhibit learned fear during conditions of safety. Our group has shown that fear inhibition is impaired in both combat and civilian PTSD populations. On the basis of our earlier findings, we employed an established fear extinction paradigm to further explore fear dysregulation in a civilian traumatized population. METHODS: Fear-potentiated startle (FPS) was examined in 127 trauma-exposed individuals with and without PTSD. We used a protocol in which conditioned fear was first acquired through the presentation of one colored shape (reinforced conditioned stimulus, [CS+]) that was paired with an aversive air blast to the larynx (unconditioned stimulus) and a different colored shape that was not paired to the air blast (nonreinforced condition stimulus). Fear was extinguished 10 min later through repeated presentations of the CSs without reinforcement. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated successful fear conditioning on the basis of startle and unconditioned stimulus-expectancy ratings; however, participants with PTSD displayed greater FPS responses to the CS+ and nonreinforced conditioned stimulus compared with the group without PTSD. During fear extinction, the PTSD group showed elevated FPS responses to the previously reinforced CS+ during the early and middle stages of extinction. During the acquisition and extinction phases, PTSDparticipants with higher levels of reexperiencing symptoms exhibited greater potentiated startle responses to the CS+ compared with PTSDparticipants with lower reexperiencing symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PTSD is associated with enhanced fear learning and a greater "fear load" to extinguish after conditioned fear is acquired.
Authors: Tanya N Alim; Elaine Graves; Thomas A Mellman; Notalelomwan Aigbogun; Ekwenzi Gray; William Lawson; Dennis S Charney Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Karestan C Koenen; Allison E Aiello; Erin Bakshis; Ananda B Amstadter; Kenneth J Ruggiero; Ron Acierno; Dean G Kilpatrick; Joel Gelernter; Sandro Galea Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Charles F Gillespie; Bekh Bradley; Kristie Mercer; Alicia K Smith; Karen Conneely; Mark Gapen; Tamara Weiss; Ann C Schwartz; Joseph F Cubells; Kerry J Ressler Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Mohammed R Milad; Gregory J Quirk; Roger K Pitman; Scott P Orr; Bruce Fischl; Scott L Rauch Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stefan G Hofmann; Alicia E Meuret; Jasper A J Smits; Naomi M Simon; Mark H Pollack; Katherine Eisenmenger; Michael Shiekh; Michael W Otto Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-03
Authors: Vanessa M Brown; Lusha Zhu; John M Wang; B Christopher Frueh; Brooks King-Casas; Pearl H Chiu Journal: Elife Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: G Andrew Mickley; Gina N Wilson; Jennifer L Remus; Linnet Ramos; Kyle D Ketchesin; Orion R Biesan; Joseph R Luchsinger; Suzanna Prodan Journal: Brain Res Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Jennifer A Sumner; Laura D Kubzansky; Andrea L Roberts; Qixuan Chen; Eric B Rimm; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Michael B VanElzakker; M Kathryn Dahlgren; F Caroline Davis; Stacey Dubois; Lisa M Shin Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Abha K Rajbhandari; Ruoyan Zhu; Cora Adling; Michael S Fanselow; James A Waschek Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Josh M Cisler; Keith Bush; J Scott Steele; Jennifer K Lenow; Sonet Smitherman; Clinton D Kilts Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 4.791